INDZ vs. NLR
INDZ (VanEck India Select ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDZ is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by VanEck, while NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. INDZ is actively managed, while NLR is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
INDZ vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INDZ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -12.27%
- YTD
- -5.84%
- 6M
- -7.12%
- 1Y
- 9.55%
- 3Y*
- 28.59%
- 5Y*
- 20.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
INDZ vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INDZ VanEck India Select ETF | 2.40% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -19.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDZ and NLR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDZ vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
INDZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NLR
INDZ vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck India Select ETF (INDZ) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDZ | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.07 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDZ vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDZ drawdown since its inception was -15.19%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDZ and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDZ | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.19% | -65.05% | +49.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -29.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -28.85% | +27.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -35.68% | +31.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.29% | — |
Volatility
INDZ vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDZ | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.15% | 42.81% | -18.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 29.65% | -5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 24.27% | -0.12% |
INDZ vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDZ vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
INDZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDZ VanEck India Select ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.71% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDZ and NLR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NLR is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NLR is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INDZ.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.00% for INDZ.
INDZ is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while NLR is Uranium. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INDZ and 0.56% for NLR.
Find the right allocation for INDZ and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer