INDY vs. DBEM
INDY (iShares India 50 ETF) and DBEM (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - INDY tracks the Nifty 50 Index while DBEM tracks the MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INDY returned 6.94%/yr vs 10.69%/yr for DBEM. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DBEM.
Performance
INDY vs. DBEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDY achieves a -12.36% return, which is significantly lower than DBEM's 27.92% return. Over the past 10 years, INDY has underperformed DBEM with an annualized return of 6.94%, while DBEM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.
INDY
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- -12.36%
- 6M
- -12.66%
- 1Y
- -12.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 6.94%
DBEM
- 1D
- -5.21%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 27.92%
- 6M
- 28.44%
- 1Y
- 54.61%
- 3Y*
- 24.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
INDY vs. DBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | -12.36% | 4.97% | 3.47% | 16.88% | -7.31% | 19.43% | 10.01% | 9.99% | -4.32% | 36.15% |
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 27.92% | 30.42% | 10.61% | 10.53% | -17.00% | -2.26% | 18.12% | 16.77% | -10.81% | 27.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDY and DBEM is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011 | 0.59 |
The correlation between INDY and DBEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.59 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INDY vs. DBEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDY
DBEM
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INDY
DBEM
Consumer Cyclical
INDY
DBEM
Energy
INDY
DBEM
Technology
INDY
DBEM
Industrials
INDY
DBEM
Basic Materials
INDY
DBEM
Consumer Defensive
INDY
DBEM
Communication Services
INDY
DBEM
Healthcare
INDY
DBEM
Utilities
INDY
DBEM
Real Estate
INDY
-
DBEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDY vs. DBEM — Risk / Return Rank
INDY
DBEM
INDY vs. DBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares India 50 ETF (INDY) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDY | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.49 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 5.22 | -5.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 19.15 | -20.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDY vs. DBEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDY drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, which is greater than DBEM's maximum drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDY and DBEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDY | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.74% | -33.51% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.95% | -10.51% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.40% | -15.12% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.40% | -30.48% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.50% | -33.51% | -9.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.17% | -5.21% | -12.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.24% | -11.66% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | 2.86% | +6.12% |
Volatility
INDY vs. DBEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares India 50 ETF (INDY) is 4.06%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that INDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDY | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 11.58% | -7.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 18.66% | -6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.36% | 20.69% | -6.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 17.70% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 17.39% | +2.14% |
INDY vs. DBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DBEM's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDY vs. DBEM - Dividend Comparison
INDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.50%, more than DBEM's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 2.06% | 1.84% | 2.48% | 2.55% | 2.65% | 1.77% | 1.74% | 2.59% | 2.85% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 3.49% |
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | 9.50% | 8.11% | 0.24% | 0.38% | 3.75% | 7.12% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.27% | 0.48% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDY and DBEM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBEM has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to INDY (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDY dropped -44.74% vs DBEM's -33.51%.
On 10-year performance, DBEM leads with 10.69% vs 6.94% for INDY. On fees, INDY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, INDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 10.69% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INDY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DBEM.
INDY has the higher dividend yield at 9.50%, compared with 2.06% for DBEM.
INDY tracks Nifty 50 Index, while DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for INDY and 0.66% for DBEM.
DBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDY and DBEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer