INDL vs. BULZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

INDL (Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares) and BULZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - INDL tracks the Indus India Index (300%) while BULZ tracks the Solactive FANG Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INDL returned -0.01%/yr vs 77.02%/yr for BULZ. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDL charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BULZ.

Performance

INDL vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDL achieves a -23.37% return, which is significantly lower than BULZ's 54.96% return.

INDL

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: -23.37%
• 6M: -20.84%
• 1Y: -28.42%
• 3Y*: -0.01%
• 5Y*: -2.48%
• 10Y*: 0.22%

BULZ

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -11.00%
• YTD: 54.96%
• 6M: 57.61%
• 1Y: 163.08%
• 3Y*: 77.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDL vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
INDL Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares	-23.37%	-3.21%	7.56%	26.06%	-22.88%	8.95%
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	54.96%	60.09%	54.09%	394.22%	-92.26%	9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between INDL and BULZ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2021	0.45

INDL vs. BULZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INDL	BULZ
Financial Services	28.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	12.8%
Industrials	10.3%	-
Energy	9.4%	-
Basic Materials	8.6%	-
Technology	8.2%	62.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	-
Healthcare	6.1%	-
Communication Services	4.6%	25.0%
Utilities	4.5%	-
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

INDL vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDL

INDL Risk / Return Rank: 2
INDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
INDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
INDL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
INDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
INDL Martin Ratio Rank: 1

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 63
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDL vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INDL	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	2.12	-3.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.37	2.36	-3.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.32	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	3.03	-3.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.55	7.94	-9.50

INDL vs. BULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDL Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the BULZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDL and BULZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INDL vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDL drawdown since its inception was -95.67%, roughly equal to the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDL and BULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	INDL	BULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.67%	-94.44%	-1.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.82%	-54.22%	+16.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.64%	-67.96%	+20.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.43%	-26.99%	-51.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.36%	-58.18%	-8.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.35%	20.62%	-2.27%

Volatility

INDL vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) is 8.12%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a volatility of 30.02%. This indicates that INDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INDL	BULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.12%	30.02%	-21.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.59%	61.86%	-36.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.71%	77.55%	-47.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.62%	91.54%	-60.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.69%	91.54%	-38.85%

INDL vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDL has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

INDL vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

INDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INDL Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares	1.64%	1.42%	2.79%	1.65%	0.09%	2.35%	0.00%	0.68%	0.18%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INDL and BULZ in my portfolio?

INDL and BULZ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INDL or BULZ?

BULZ has higher volatility (30.02%) compared to INDL (8.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDL dropped -95.67% vs BULZ's -94.44%.

Which ETF is better, INDL or BULZ?

On 3-year performance, BULZ leads with 77.02% vs -0.01% for INDL. On fees, BULZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, INDL has been the lower-risk option at 8.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INDL or BULZ?

Over the 3-year period, BULZ has performed better with a 77.02% return vs -0.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INDL or BULZ?

BULZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for INDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INDL or BULZ?

INDL has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.

What is the main difference between INDL and BULZ?

INDL tracks Indus India Index (300%), while BULZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for INDL and 0.95% for BULZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.