INDAX vs. FEATX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INDAX (ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund) and FEATX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, INDAX returned 6.87%/yr vs 15.80%/yr for FEATX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDAX charges 1.33%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for FEATX.

Performance

INDAX vs. FEATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund (INDAX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDAX achieves a -14.39% return, which is significantly lower than FEATX's 39.88% return. Over the past 10 years, INDAX has underperformed FEATX with an annualized return of 6.87%, while FEATX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.80% annualized return.

INDAX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -2.78%
• YTD: -14.39%
• 6M: -13.28%
• 1Y: -14.47%
• 3Y*: 3.08%
• 5Y*: 1.85%
• 10Y*: 6.87%

FEATX

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: 12.48%
• YTD: 39.88%
• 6M: 45.14%
• 1Y: 75.17%
• 3Y*: 34.64%
• 5Y*: 8.33%
• 10Y*: 15.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDAX vs. FEATX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INDAX ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund	-14.39%	2.03%	10.94%	16.77%	-12.62%	26.37%	14.68%	8.41%	-12.51%	39.77%
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	39.88%	36.34%	20.32%	13.22%	-30.99%	-15.29%	72.05%	30.26%	-15.36%	45.82%

Correlation

The correlation between INDAX and FEATX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2011	0.53

The correlation between INDAX and FEATX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INDAX vs. FEATX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INDAX	FEATX
Financial Services	32.9%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	14.8%	10.8%
Industrials	10.4%	11.3%
Technology	8.7%	42.6%
Energy	7.2%	2.0%
Communication Services	7.2%	7.4%
Healthcare	5.8%	4.2%
Basic Materials	5.5%	5.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.3%	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

INDAX vs. FEATX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDAX

INDAX Risk / Return Rank: 0
INDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
INDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
INDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
INDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
INDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

FEATX

FEATX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FEATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FEATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FEATX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FEATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FEATX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDAX vs. FEATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund (INDAX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INDAX	FEATX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.04	3.84	-4.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.45	4.55	-6.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.68	-0.84
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	5.60	-6.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.72	20.29	-22.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INDAX vs. FEATX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDAX Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the FEATX Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDAX and FEATX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INDAX	FEATX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.04	3.84	-4.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.37	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.76	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.48	-0.13

Drawdowns

INDAX vs. FEATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDAX drawdown since its inception was -43.98%, smaller than the maximum FEATX drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDAX and FEATX.

Drawdown Indicators

	INDAX	FEATX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.98%	-60.97%	+16.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.85%	-13.58%	-7.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.49%	-17.43%	-6.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.49%	-53.63%	+30.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.98%	-58.09%	+14.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.39%	0.00%	-20.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.76%	-20.68%	+9.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.80%	3.74%	+5.06%

Volatility

INDAX vs. FEATX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund (INDAX) is 5.14%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M (FEATX) has a volatility of 8.58%. This indicates that INDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INDAX	FEATX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.14%	8.58%	-3.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.46%	16.67%	-4.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.51%	19.83%	-5.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.08%	22.91%	-7.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.85%	20.98%	-4.13%

INDAX vs. FEATX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FEATX's 1.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

INDAX vs. FEATX - Dividend Comparison

INDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, while FEATX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEATX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class M	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.43%	6.70%	5.07%	6.24%	0.03%	0.89%	0.87%
INDAX ALPS/Kotak India ESG Fund	6.57%	5.62%	16.14%	4.43%	1.65%	5.48%	0.00%	1.30%	6.55%	2.79%	1.32%	15.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INDAX and FEATX in my portfolio?

INDAX and FEATX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INDAX or FEATX?

FEATX has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to INDAX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDAX dropped -43.98% vs FEATX's -60.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.