IND vs. FLAU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IND (Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF) and FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IND tracks the Nifty 500 Index while FLAU tracks the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IND charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLAU.

Performance

IND vs. FLAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF (IND) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IND achieves a -11.42% return, which is significantly lower than FLAU's 10.47% return.

IND

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -0.79%
• YTD: -11.42%
• 6M: -10.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLAU

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 12.59%
• 1Y: 16.61%
• 3Y*: 12.97%
• 5Y*: 5.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IND vs. FLAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IND Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF	-11.42%	-1.11%
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	10.47%	4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IND and FLAU is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

IND vs. FLAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAU

FLAU Risk / Return Rank: 29
FLAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FLAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FLAU Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FLAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FLAU Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IND vs. FLAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF (IND) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IND	FLAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.13	0.33	-1.46

Drawdowns

IND vs. FLAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IND drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, smaller than the maximum FLAU drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IND and FLAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	IND	FLAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.75%	-45.73%	+26.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.01%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.57%	-3.11%	-9.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.47%	-6.79%	-0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.23%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IND	FLAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.45%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.66%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.26%	16.63%	+3.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.26%	19.61%	+0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.26%	23.58%	-3.32%

IND vs. FLAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IND has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLAU's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IND vs. FLAU - Dividend Comparison

IND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	2.94%	3.25%	3.37%	3.62%	5.91%	5.14%	2.18%	4.37%	4.34%	0.18%
IND Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IND and FLAU in my portfolio?

IND and FLAU have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IND or FLAU?

On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IND or FLAU?

FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IND or FLAU?

FLAU has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.00% for IND.

What is the main difference between IND and FLAU?

IND tracks Nifty 500 Index, while FLAU tracks FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IND and 0.09% for FLAU.