INCO vs. PVAL
INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) and PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Indxx India Consumer Index, while PVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Putnam. INCO is passively managed, while PVAL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, INCO returned 5.53%/yr vs 15.91%/yr for PVAL. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INCO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PVAL.
Performance
INCO vs. PVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -12.41% return, which is significantly lower than PVAL's 11.24% return.
INCO
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -6.27%
- YTD
- -12.41%
- 6M
- -10.02%
- 1Y
- -12.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
PVAL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 31.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- —
INCO vs. PVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | -12.41% | 0.59% | 12.70% | 34.63% | -7.01% | 7.88% |
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 11.24% | 24.13% | 19.30% | 18.41% | -2.61% | 11.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCO and PVAL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.40 |
INCO vs. PVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INCO
PVAL
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
INCO
PVAL
Consumer Defensive
INCO
PVAL
Technology
INCO
PVAL
Industrials
INCO
PVAL
Basic Materials
INCO
-
PVAL
Communication Services
INCO
-
PVAL
Energy
INCO
-
PVAL
Financial Services
INCO
-
PVAL
Healthcare
INCO
-
PVAL
Real Estate
INCO
-
PVAL
Utilities
INCO
-
PVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCO vs. PVAL — Risk / Return Rank
INCO
PVAL
INCO vs. PVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INCO | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.52 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 4.31 | -4.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 16.44 | -17.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INCO | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 | 2.86 | -3.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 1.05 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.06 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
INCO vs. PVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, which is greater than PVAL's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and PVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCO | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.69% | -16.64% | -31.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.37% | -7.22% | -14.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.98% | -15.42% | -14.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.98% | -16.64% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.40% | -1.60% | -23.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -3.01% | -7.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.47% | 1.89% | +6.58% |
Volatility
INCO vs. PVAL - Volatility Comparison
Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) at 2.87%. This indicates that INCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCO | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 2.87% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.33% | 8.41% | +5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 10.91% | +5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 15.29% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.32% | 15.24% | +5.08% |
INCO vs. PVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PVAL's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCO vs. PVAL - Dividend Comparison
INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.88% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% |
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 0.98% | 1.00% | 1.34% | 1.33% | 0.59% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCO and PVAL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INCO has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to PVAL (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs PVAL's -16.64%.
On 5-year performance, PVAL leads with 15.91% vs 5.53% for INCO. On fees, PVAL is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 15.91% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PVAL is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.
PVAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.
INCO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.55% for PVAL.
PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCO and PVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer