INCO vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Indxx India Consumer Index, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. INCO is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, INCO returned 8.08%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for PIT. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INCO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

INCO vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 27.31% return.

INCO

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 3.89%
• YTD: -7.34%
• 6M: -7.14%
• 1Y: -5.19%
• 3Y*: 8.08%
• 5Y*: 7.03%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

PIT

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -10.60%
• YTD: 27.31%
• 6M: 26.74%
• 1Y: 38.33%
• 3Y*: 19.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCO vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	-7.34%	0.59%	12.70%	34.63%	-0.44%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	27.31%	21.63%	6.77%	-4.54%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between INCO and PIT is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022	0.01

The correlation between INCO and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

INCO vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCO

INCO Risk / Return Rank: 6
INCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
INCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
INCO Omega Ratio Rank: 6
INCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
INCO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCO vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INCO	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.31	1.78	-2.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	2.32	-2.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.32	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	2.74	-2.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.59	10.88	-11.47

INCO vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCO and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INCO vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	INCO	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.69%	-14.05%	-33.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.37%	-14.05%	-7.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.98%	-14.05%	-15.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.09%	-14.05%	-7.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.61%	-4.07%	-6.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.84%	3.59%	+5.25%

Volatility

INCO vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) at 4.67%. This indicates that INCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INCO	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.93%	4.67%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.49%	19.36%	-4.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.01%	21.66%	-4.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.97%	17.50%	-0.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.33%	17.50%	+2.83%

INCO vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

INCO vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.88%	3.81%	10.57%	6.25%	0.34%	0.28%	0.12%	0.05%	0.09%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	7.00%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INCO and PIT in my portfolio?

INCO and PIT have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INCO or PIT?

INCO has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to PIT (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs PIT's -14.05%.

Which ETF is better, INCO or PIT?

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 19.51% vs 8.08% for INCO. On fees, PIT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PIT has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INCO or PIT?

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INCO or PIT?

PIT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INCO or PIT?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.

What is the main difference between INCO and PIT?

INCO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.55% for PIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.