INCO vs. EWM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) and EWM (iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - INCO tracks the Indxx India Consumer Index while EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INCO returned 8.19%/yr vs 2.59%/yr for EWM. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INCO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWM.

Performance

INCO vs. EWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -12.27% return, which is significantly lower than EWM's 2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, INCO has outperformed EWM with an annualized return of 8.19%, while EWM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.59% annualized return.

INCO

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: -12.27%
• 6M: -10.65%
• 1Y: -11.02%
• 3Y*: 6.36%
• 5Y*: 5.56%
• 10Y*: 8.19%

EWM

• 1D: -2.37%
• 1M: -5.11%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 6.54%
• 1Y: 20.74%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: 4.53%
• 10Y*: 2.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCO vs. EWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	-12.27%	0.59%	12.70%	34.63%	-7.01%	19.28%	14.55%	-4.22%	-10.81%	53.28%
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF	2.45%	15.74%	19.46%	-3.61%	-6.00%	-7.40%	3.12%	-1.41%	-6.28%	24.25%

Correlation

The correlation between INCO and EWM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2011	0.42

The correlation between INCO and EWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INCO vs. EWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INCO	EWM
Consumer Cyclical	59.3%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	37.5%	7.3%
Technology	1.9%	-
Industrials	1.4%	11.1%
Basic Materials	-	8.9%
Communication Services	-	6.6%
Energy	-	3.9%
Financial Services	-	46.6%
Healthcare	-	3.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	10.8%

Return for Risk

INCO vs. EWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCO

INCO Risk / Return Rank: 3
INCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
INCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
INCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
INCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
INCO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EWM

EWM Risk / Return Rank: 45
EWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
EWM Omega Ratio Rank: 40
EWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
EWM Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCO vs. EWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INCO	EWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	1.49	-2.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.87	2.09	-2.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.26	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	2.65	-3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	8.22	-9.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INCO vs. EWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the EWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCO and EWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INCO	EWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.66	1.49	-2.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.33	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.16	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.07	+0.35

Drawdowns

INCO vs. EWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, smaller than the maximum EWM drawdown of -89.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and EWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	INCO	EWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.69%	-89.19%	+41.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.37%	-7.86%	-13.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.98%	-21.31%	-8.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.98%	-22.76%	-7.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.69%	-43.81%	-3.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.29%	-9.46%	-15.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.57%	-31.82%	+21.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.30%	2.53%	+5.77%

Volatility

INCO vs. EWM - Volatility Comparison

Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) at 4.15%. This indicates that INCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INCO	EWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.78%	4.15%	+1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.29%	10.86%	+3.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.78%	13.99%	+2.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.89%	13.70%	+3.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.31%	16.29%	+4.02%

INCO vs. EWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EWM's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

INCO vs. EWM - Dividend Comparison

INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF	3.33%	3.41%	3.32%	3.47%	3.00%	6.48%	1.89%	2.91%	3.84%	5.58%	5.97%	37.54%
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.88%	3.81%	10.57%	6.25%	0.34%	0.28%	0.12%	0.05%	0.09%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INCO and EWM in my portfolio?

INCO and EWM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INCO or EWM?

INCO has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to EWM (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs EWM's -89.19%.

Which ETF is better, INCO or EWM?

On 10-year performance, INCO leads with 8.19% vs 2.59% for EWM. On fees, EWM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INCO or EWM?

Over the 10-year period, INCO has performed better with a 8.19% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INCO or EWM?

EWM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INCO or EWM?

EWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.

What is the main difference between INCO and EWM?

INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index, while EWM tracks MSCI Malaysia Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.49% for EWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.