PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INCM vs. MDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INCM vs. MDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCM achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than MDIV's 7.68% return.


INCM

1D
-0.48%
1M
0.70%
YTD
6.45%
6M
6.84%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MDIV

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.10%
YTD
7.68%
6M
7.38%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
11.41%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
4.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCM vs. MDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
6.45%13.07%6.80%5.76%
MDIV
First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund
7.68%3.77%10.05%10.80%

Correlation

The correlation between INCM and MDIV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023

0.69

The correlation between INCM and MDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

INCM vs. MDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INCM
MDIV

Financial Services

8.2%
22.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
8.0%

Utilities

4.9%
9.6%

Energy

3.8%
17.6%

Healthcare

2.6%
1.6%

Technology

2.4%

-

Industrials

1.9%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
0.7%

Communication Services

1.7%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
3.2%

Real Estate

0.0%
21.6%

Financial Services

INCM
8.2%
MDIV
22.4%

Consumer Defensive

INCM
6.7%
MDIV
8.0%

Utilities

INCM
4.9%
MDIV
9.6%

Energy

INCM
3.8%
MDIV
17.6%

Healthcare

INCM
2.6%
MDIV
1.6%

Technology

INCM
2.4%
MDIV

-

Industrials

INCM
1.9%
MDIV
1.6%

Basic Materials

INCM
1.9%
MDIV
0.7%

Communication Services

INCM
1.7%
MDIV
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

INCM
1.5%
MDIV
3.2%

Real Estate

INCM
0.0%
MDIV
21.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INCM vs. MDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCM
INCM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MDIV
MDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCM vs. MDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INCMMDIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.01

1.65

+1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.49

2.44

+2.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.29

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.95

3.27

+1.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.86

9.10

+11.76

INCM vs. MDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCM Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the MDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCM and MDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INCMMDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

1.65

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.34

+1.16

Drawdowns

INCM vs. MDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCM drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum MDIV drawdown of -48.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCM and MDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INCMMDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-48.50%

+40.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-3.39%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-1.14%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-4.58%

+3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

1.22%

-0.46%

Volatility

INCM vs. MDIV - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) and First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) have volatilities of 1.66% and 1.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INCMMDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.62%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.82%

4.32%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.25%

6.71%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.23%

10.93%

-3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.23%

15.23%

-8.00%

INCM vs. MDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MDIV's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

INCM vs. MDIV - Dividend Comparison

INCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, less than MDIV's 6.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
5.08%4.96%5.06%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDIV
First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund
6.39%6.51%6.40%6.08%6.71%5.30%6.00%5.90%6.76%6.04%6.35%7.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


INCM and MDIV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INCM has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to MDIV (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCM dropped -7.84% vs MDIV's -48.50%.

On 1-year performance, INCM leads with 15.73% vs 11.03% for MDIV. On fees, INCM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INCM has performed better with a 15.73% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INCM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MDIV.

MDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 5.08% for INCM.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for INCM and 0.73% for MDIV.

INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INCM and MDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer