INCE vs. GRID
INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) and GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. INCE is actively managed, while GRID is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INCE returned 11.19%/yr vs 16.83%/yr for GRID. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INCE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.
Performance
INCE vs. GRID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCE achieves a 13.74% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 23.59% return.
INCE
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 13.74%
- 6M
- 14.18%
- 1Y
- 26.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
GRID
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 24.02%
- 1Y
- 43.17%
- 3Y*
- 23.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.83%
- 10Y*
- 19.76%
INCE vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 13.74% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 19.66% |
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 23.59% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | -13.89% | 27.65% | 48.84% | 42.80% | -22.69% | 27.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCE and GRID is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.64 |
The correlation between INCE and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INCE vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INCE
GRID
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
INCE
GRID
Consumer Defensive
INCE
GRID
-
Energy
INCE
GRID
Utilities
INCE
GRID
Technology
INCE
GRID
Financial Services
INCE
GRID
-
Basic Materials
INCE
GRID
Healthcare
INCE
GRID
-
Communication Services
INCE
GRID
-
Consumer Cyclical
INCE
GRID
Real Estate
INCE
-
GRID
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCE vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank
INCE
GRID
INCE vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INCE | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.35 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.18 | 3.57 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.39 | 12.89 | +6.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INCE vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCE drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCE and GRID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCE | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -40.56% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.90% | -11.73% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.01% | -20.77% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.40% | -29.64% | +11.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -5.40% | +5.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -8.42% | +5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 3.25% | -1.94% |
Volatility
INCE vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is 2.42%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that INCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCE | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 9.56% | -7.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.07% | 17.70% | -11.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.41% | 20.73% | -12.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 21.24% | -7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 22.90% | -7.22% |
INCE vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCE vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison
INCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than GRID's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.80% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 4.70% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCE and GRID have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRID has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to INCE (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCE dropped -33.95% vs GRID's -40.56%.
On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 16.83% vs 11.19% for INCE. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 16.83% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.
INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.
INCE is categorized as Dividend, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for INCE and 0.70% for GRID.
INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCE and GRID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer