INCE vs. ATFV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) and ATFV (Alger 35 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while ATFV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. INCE is actively managed, while ATFV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INCE returned 10.49%/yr vs 12.98%/yr for ATFV. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. INCE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ATFV.

Performance

INCE vs. ATFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and Alger 35 ETF (ATFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCE achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly higher than ATFV's 13.28% return.

INCE

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 7.74%
• YTD: 14.91%
• 1Y: 26.00%
• 3Y*: 15.52%
• 5Y*: 10.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.06%

ATFV

• 1D: 2.97%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 14.49%
• YTD: 13.28%
• 1Y: 29.89%
• 3Y*: 36.70%
• 5Y*: 12.98%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	$2.60M	$1.77M	$2.46M
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	$621.36K	$657.47K	$945.62K

INCE vs. ATFV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	14.91%	15.92%	10.70%	13.87%	-8.54%	12.97%
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	13.28%	38.20%	46.14%	32.75%	-35.97%	3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between INCE and ATFV is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2021	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between INCE and ATFV has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

INCE vs. ATFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INCE	ATFV
Financial Services	13.3%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	9.3%	-
Industrials	8.9%	10.3%
Healthcare	7.0%	8.9%
Utilities	6.8%	4.8%
Energy	5.6%	-
Technology	3.6%	43.2%
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	8.3%
Basic Materials	2.7%	-
Communication Services	2.4%	23.6%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

INCE vs. ATFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INCE

INCE Risk / Return Rank: 96
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 95
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ATFV

ATFV Risk / Return Rank: 43
ATFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
ATFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ATFV Omega Ratio Rank: 41
ATFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
ATFV Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INCE vs. ATFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and Alger 35 ETF (ATFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INCE	ATFV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.09	1.12	+1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.48	1.67	+2.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.20	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.24	1.64	+3.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.20	4.95	+15.25

INCE vs. ATFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCE Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the ATFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCE and ATFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INCE vs. ATFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCE drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum ATFV drawdown of -45.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCE and ATFV.

Drawdown Indicators

	INCE	ATFV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.95%	-45.34%	+11.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.90%	-18.29%	+13.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.01%	-29.01%	+15.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.40%	-45.34%	+26.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-5.38%	+5.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.22%	-17.46%	+14.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	6.06%	-4.79%

Volatility

INCE vs. ATFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is 2.46%, while Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a volatility of 11.08%. This indicates that INCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INCE	ATFV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	11.08%	-8.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.15%	21.90%	-15.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.40%	26.92%	-18.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.25%	27.40%	-14.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.60%	27.01%	-11.41%

INCE vs. ATFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ATFV's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

INCE vs. ATFV - Dividend Comparison

INCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than ATFV's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	0.18%	0.20%	0.16%	0.01%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	4.84%	4.71%	3.25%	1.75%	1.68%	1.41%	1.40%	1.31%	1.55%	1.44%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INCE and ATFV in my portfolio?

INCE and ATFV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INCE or ATFV?

ATFV has higher volatility (11.08%) compared to INCE (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCE dropped -33.95% vs ATFV's -45.34%.

Which ETF is better, INCE or ATFV?

On 5-year performance, ATFV leads with 12.98% vs 10.49% for INCE. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INCE or ATFV?

Over the 5-year period, ATFV has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INCE or ATFV?

INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ATFV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INCE or ATFV?

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 0.18% for ATFV.

What is the main difference between INCE and ATFV?

INCE is categorized as Dividend, while ATFV is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Alger. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for INCE and 0.55% for ATFV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.