INAA.L vs. XZMD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

INAA.L (iShares MSCI North America UCITS) and XZMD.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from iShares and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INAA.L returned 18.80%/yr vs 19.56%/yr for XZMD.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INAA.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XZMD.L.

Performance

INAA.L vs. XZMD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

INAA.L is traded in GBp, while XZMD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XZMD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INAA.L achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly higher than XZMD.L's 8.47% return.

INAA.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 5.57%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 6M: 10.24%
• 1Y: 28.60%
• 3Y*: 18.80%
• 5Y*: 14.13%
• 10Y*: 15.50%

XZMD.L

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: 8.47%
• 6M: 8.64%
• 1Y: 26.95%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INAA.L vs. XZMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
INAA.L iShares MSCI North America UCITS	10.28%	9.48%	26.59%	19.48%	-5.44%
XZMD.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D	8.47%	8.37%	27.57%	23.85%	-5.73%

Correlation

The correlation between INAA.L and XZMD.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2022	0.49

The correlation between INAA.L and XZMD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INAA.L vs. XZMD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INAA.L	XZMD.L
Technology	36.4%	37.2%
Financial Services	12.4%	12.7%
Communication Services	10.4%	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	9.8%
Industrials	8.2%	8.7%
Healthcare	8.1%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	1.3%
Energy	4.1%	0.1%
Basic Materials	2.3%	1.6%
Utilities	2.1%	0.3%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.7%

Return for Risk

INAA.L vs. XZMD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INAA.L

INAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
INAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
INAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
INAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
INAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
INAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

XZMD.L

XZMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
XZMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
XZMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
XZMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
XZMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
XZMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INAA.L vs. XZMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INAA.L	XZMD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	4.10	-1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	5.71	-2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.74	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.93	8.29	-4.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.18	25.82	-11.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INAA.L vs. XZMD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is lower than the XZMD.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INAA.L and XZMD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INAA.L	XZMD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	4.10	-1.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	1.39	-0.65

Drawdowns

INAA.L vs. XZMD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INAA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, which is greater than XZMD.L's maximum drawdown of -22.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INAA.L and XZMD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	INAA.L	XZMD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.35%	-22.72%	-12.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.24%	-10.21%	+2.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.20%	-22.72%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.05%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.71%	-5.03%	+0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	7.53%	-5.52%

Volatility

INAA.L vs. XZMD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI North America UCITS (INAA.L) is 2.63%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.L) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that INAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XZMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INAA.L	XZMD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	3.90%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.60%	20.73%	-10.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.42%	22.32%	-7.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.63%	22.32%	-6.69%

INAA.L vs. XZMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

INAA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XZMD.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

INAA.L vs. XZMD.L - Dividend Comparison

INAA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than XZMD.L's 0.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INAA.L iShares MSCI North America UCITS	0.61%	0.66%	0.76%	0.98%	1.11%	0.74%	1.09%	1.26%	1.40%	1.32%	1.30%	1.51%
XZMD.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D	0.68%	0.79%	0.95%	0.95%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INAA.L and XZMD.L in my portfolio?

INAA.L and XZMD.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INAA.L or XZMD.L?

On fees, XZMD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INAA.L or XZMD.L?

XZMD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for INAA.L.

What is the main difference between INAA.L and XZMD.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for INAA.L and 0.15% for XZMD.L.