IMVT vs. TLT
IMVT (Immunovant, Inc.) is a stock, while TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Over the past 5 years, IMVT returned 25.69%/yr vs -6.31%/yr for TLT. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IMVT vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMVT achieves a 22.54% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return.
IMVT
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 11.85%
- YTD
- 22.54%
- 6M
- 37.16%
- 1Y
- 101.75%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- 25.69%
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -6.31%
- 10Y*
- -1.66%
IMVT vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMVT Immunovant, Inc. | 22.54% | 2.62% | -41.21% | 137.35% | 108.33% | -81.55% | 191.05% | -0.69% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.27% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | -0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMVT and TLT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMVT vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
IMVT
TLT
IMVT vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMVT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.09 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.88 | 0.65 | +4.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.26 | 1.63 | +9.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMVT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 0.51 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | -0.40 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.26 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
IMVT vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMVT drawdown since its inception was -93.59%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMVT and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMVT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.59% | -48.35% | -45.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.98% | -7.58% | -13.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.88% | -19.18% | -50.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.38% | -43.70% | -26.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.90% | -40.44% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.01% | -13.82% | -40.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.07% | 3.04% | +6.03% |
Volatility
IMVT vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) has a higher volatility of 33.78% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.76%. This indicates that IMVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMVT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.78% | 2.76% | +31.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.71% | 6.50% | +38.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.24% | 9.77% | +52.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.80% | 15.87% | +58.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.28% | 14.91% | +63.37% |
Dividends
IMVT vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
IMVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMVT Immunovant, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.59% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMVT and TLT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMVT has higher volatility (33.78%) compared to TLT (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMVT dropped -93.59% vs TLT's -48.35%.
IMVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMVT and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer