PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMVP vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMVP vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco India ETF (IMVP) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMVP achieves a -16.08% return, which is significantly lower than EDIV's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, IMVP has underperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 8.19%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.16% annualized return.


IMVP

1D
-2.11%
1M
-2.53%
YTD
-16.08%
6M
-14.80%
1Y
-16.87%
3Y*
2.95%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
8.19%

EDIV

1D
-1.27%
1M
2.48%
YTD
6.42%
6M
7.80%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
9.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMVP vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMVP
Invesco India ETF
-16.08%1.30%9.07%22.82%-9.35%23.68%18.41%14.26%-7.55%38.51%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
6.42%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between IMVP and EDIV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2011

0.62

The correlation between IMVP and EDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMVP vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMVP
IMVP Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMVP vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco India ETF (IMVP) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMVPEDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.22

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

1.37

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.84

4.23

-6.07

IMVP vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMVP Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMVP and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMVPEDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.05

1.16

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.78

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.53

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.17

-0.05

Drawdowns

IMVP vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMVP drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, which is greater than EDIV's maximum drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMVP and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMVPEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.54%

-53.36%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.44%

-10.36%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.80%

-13.84%

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.80%

-28.32%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-40.76%

+1.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.71%

-4.07%

-19.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.70%

-19.36%

+2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.16%

3.34%

+5.82%

Volatility

IMVP vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco India ETF (IMVP) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.11%. This indicates that IMVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMVPEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

4.11%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

10.03%

+4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

12.19%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

13.83%

+2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

17.49%

+2.10%

IMVP vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMVP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMVP vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

IMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, more than EDIV's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.50%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
IMVP
Invesco India ETF
8.81%7.39%8.48%2.08%14.07%6.95%0.72%36.35%0.96%1.01%1.18%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMVP and EDIV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMVP has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to EDIV (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMVP dropped -64.54% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 10-year performance, EDIV leads with 9.16% vs 8.19% for IMVP. On fees, EDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 9.16% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IMVP.

IMVP has the higher dividend yield at 8.81%, compared with 4.50% for EDIV.

IMVP tracks FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IMVP and 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMVP and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer