PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTM vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTM vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, IMTM has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 10.29%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.


IMTM

1D
-0.39%
1M
4.43%
YTD
11.05%
6M
14.04%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.29%

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
11.05%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%25.46%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and XMMO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2015

0.63

The correlation between IMTM and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMTM vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMTM
XMMO

Financial Services

29.6%
2.4%

Industrials

17.5%
41.1%

Technology

11.4%
16.7%

Energy

9.4%
7.7%

Basic Materials

9.3%
7.2%

Healthcare

9.0%
6.3%

Utilities

6.4%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
0.5%

Communication Services

1.9%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
4.6%

Real Estate

1.2%
6.1%

Financial Services

IMTM
29.6%
XMMO
2.4%

Industrials

IMTM
17.5%
XMMO
41.1%

Technology

IMTM
11.4%
XMMO
16.7%

Energy

IMTM
9.4%
XMMO
7.7%

Basic Materials

IMTM
9.3%
XMMO
7.2%

Healthcare

IMTM
9.0%
XMMO
6.3%

Utilities

IMTM
6.4%
XMMO
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

IMTM
2.4%
XMMO
0.5%

Communication Services

IMTM
1.9%
XMMO
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IMTM
1.8%
XMMO
4.6%

Real Estate

IMTM
1.2%
XMMO
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTM vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMTMXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

4.45

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

18.21

-10.75

IMTM vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMTMXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.99

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.78

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.89

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.58

-0.07

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTMXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-55.37%

+22.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-8.34%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-24.93%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-27.91%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.66%

-36.74%

+4.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-9.45%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

2.04%

+1.17%

Volatility

IMTM vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) is 5.48%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that IMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTMXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

7.82%

-2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

15.54%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.04%

18.71%

-1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

21.45%

-3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

22.27%

-4.63%

IMTM vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMTM vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.23%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMTM and XMMO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to IMTM (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 10.29% for IMTM. On fees, IMTM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IMTM has been the lower-risk option at 5.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 10.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMTM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTM and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer