IMTM vs. SPHQ
IMTM (iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMTM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMTM returned 10.44%/yr vs 15.27%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMTM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
IMTM vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IMTM has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 10.44%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.
IMTM
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 25.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 15.77%
- 1Y
- 26.53%
- 3Y*
- 22.40%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
IMTM vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | 11.53% | 34.50% | 12.17% | 13.89% | -16.81% | 3.50% | 22.17% | 24.52% | -14.31% | 25.46% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.79% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTM and SPHQ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2015 | 0.68 |
The correlation between IMTM and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMTM vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMTM
SPHQ
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
IMTM
SPHQ
Technology
IMTM
SPHQ
Industrials
IMTM
SPHQ
Energy
IMTM
SPHQ
Basic Materials
IMTM
SPHQ
Healthcare
IMTM
SPHQ
Utilities
IMTM
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
IMTM
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
IMTM
SPHQ
Communication Services
IMTM
SPHQ
Real Estate
IMTM
SPHQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTM vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
IMTM
SPHQ
IMTM vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMTM | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.75 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 11.76 | -4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMTM vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTM | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -57.83% | +25.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.85% | -8.90% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.85% | -16.57% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.66% | -25.04% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.66% | -31.60% | -1.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | 0.00% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -10.69% | +3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 2.09% | +1.15% |
Volatility
IMTM vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 4.92%. This indicates that IMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTM | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 4.92% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.06% | 10.83% | +5.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.97% | 13.18% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 16.53% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 17.90% | -0.27% |
IMTM vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMTM vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | 4.22% | 4.70% | 2.93% | 2.29% | 2.68% | 2.51% | 0.97% | 2.13% | 2.36% | 1.92% | 2.75% | 1.56% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMTM and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMTM has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to SPHQ (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.27% vs 10.44% for IMTM. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.27% return vs 10.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.
IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.
IMTM is categorized as Momentum, while SPHQ is S&P 500. IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMTM and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer