PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTM vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTM vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IMTM has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 10.44%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.


IMTM

1D
0.72%
1M
0.94%
YTD
11.53%
6M
12.83%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
10.44%

SPHQ

1D
1.02%
1M
4.96%
YTD
16.79%
6M
15.77%
1Y
26.53%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
14.55%
10Y*
15.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
11.53%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%25.46%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
16.79%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and SPHQ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2015

0.68

The correlation between IMTM and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMTM vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMTM
SPHQ

Financial Services

28.6%
12.6%

Technology

15.6%
33.1%

Industrials

15.5%
20.7%

Energy

10.0%
0.7%

Basic Materials

9.7%
2.0%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.0%

Utilities

5.3%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
4.4%

Communication Services

1.5%
0.4%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Financial Services

IMTM
28.6%
SPHQ
12.6%

Technology

IMTM
15.6%
SPHQ
33.1%

Industrials

IMTM
15.5%
SPHQ
20.7%

Energy

IMTM
10.0%
SPHQ
0.7%

Basic Materials

IMTM
9.7%
SPHQ
2.0%

Healthcare

IMTM
8.9%
SPHQ
8.0%

Utilities

IMTM
5.3%
SPHQ
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

IMTM
2.1%
SPHQ
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IMTM
1.8%
SPHQ
4.4%

Communication Services

IMTM
1.5%
SPHQ
0.4%

Real Estate

IMTM
1.1%
SPHQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTM vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMTMSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.75

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

11.76

-4.40

IMTM vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTMSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-57.83%

+25.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-8.90%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-16.57%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-25.04%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.66%

-31.60%

-1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

0.00%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-10.69%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

2.09%

+1.15%

Volatility

IMTM vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 4.92%. This indicates that IMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTMSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

4.92%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.06%

10.83%

+5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.97%

13.18%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

16.53%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

17.90%

-0.27%

IMTM vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMTM vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.22%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.03%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMTM and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMTM has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to SPHQ (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.27% vs 10.44% for IMTM. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.27% return vs 10.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.

IMTM is categorized as Momentum, while SPHQ is S&P 500. IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTM and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer