PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTM vs. MMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTM vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, IMTM has underperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 10.29%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.


IMTM

1D
-0.39%
1M
4.43%
YTD
11.05%
6M
14.04%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.29%

MMTM

1D
-1.07%
1M
2.46%
YTD
9.16%
6M
9.58%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
11.05%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%25.46%
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
9.16%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%24.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and MMTM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2015

0.65

The correlation between IMTM and MMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMTM vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMTM
MMTM

Financial Services

29.6%
16.0%

Industrials

17.5%
7.6%

Technology

11.4%
29.5%

Energy

9.4%
1.7%

Basic Materials

9.3%
2.0%

Healthcare

9.0%
10.8%

Utilities

6.4%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
6.7%

Communication Services

1.9%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
12.4%

Real Estate

1.2%
3.1%

Financial Services

IMTM
29.6%
MMTM
16.0%

Industrials

IMTM
17.5%
MMTM
7.6%

Technology

IMTM
11.4%
MMTM
29.5%

Energy

IMTM
9.4%
MMTM
1.7%

Basic Materials

IMTM
9.3%
MMTM
2.0%

Healthcare

IMTM
9.0%
MMTM
10.8%

Utilities

IMTM
6.4%
MMTM
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

IMTM
2.4%
MMTM
6.7%

Communication Services

IMTM
1.9%
MMTM
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IMTM
1.8%
MMTM
12.4%

Real Estate

IMTM
1.2%
MMTM
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTM vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMTMMMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.46

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

11.15

-3.68

IMTM vs. MMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the MMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and MMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMTMMMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.72

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.75

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.81

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.85

-0.35

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, roughly equal to the maximum MMTM drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and MMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTMMMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-33.85%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-9.89%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-22.08%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-23.72%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.66%

-33.85%

+1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-1.48%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-4.20%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

2.18%

+1.03%

Volatility

IMTM vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 2.35%. This indicates that IMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTMMMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

2.35%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

10.73%

+4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.04%

14.19%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

18.20%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

18.65%

-1.01%

IMTM vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMTM vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than MMTM's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.23%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.78%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMTM and MMTM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMTM has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to MMTM (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs MMTM's -33.85%.

On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 15.00% vs 10.29% for IMTM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 15.00% return vs 10.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 0.78% for MMTM.

IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.12% for MMTM.

MMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTM and MMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer