IMTM vs. MMTM
IMTM (iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF) and MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) are both Momentum funds - IMTM tracks the MSCI World ex USA Momentum while MMTM tracks the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMTM returned 10.29%/yr vs 15.00%/yr for MMTM. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMTM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for MMTM.
Performance
IMTM vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, IMTM has underperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 10.29%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.
IMTM
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 6M
- 14.04%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
MMTM
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
IMTM vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | 11.05% | 34.50% | 12.17% | 13.89% | -16.81% | 3.50% | 22.17% | 24.52% | -14.31% | 25.46% |
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 9.16% | 13.26% | 29.94% | 22.49% | -16.12% | 26.33% | 19.27% | 29.98% | -4.62% | 24.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTM and MMTM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2015 | 0.65 |
The correlation between IMTM and MMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMTM vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMTM
MMTM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
IMTM
MMTM
Industrials
IMTM
MMTM
Technology
IMTM
MMTM
Energy
IMTM
MMTM
Basic Materials
IMTM
MMTM
Healthcare
IMTM
MMTM
Utilities
IMTM
MMTM
Consumer Defensive
IMTM
MMTM
Communication Services
IMTM
MMTM
Consumer Cyclical
IMTM
MMTM
Real Estate
IMTM
MMTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTM vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank
IMTM
MMTM
IMTM vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMTM | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.31 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.46 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 11.15 | -3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMTM | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.72 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.75 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.81 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.85 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
IMTM vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, roughly equal to the maximum MMTM drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and MMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTM | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -33.85% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.85% | -9.89% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.85% | -22.08% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.66% | -23.72% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.66% | -33.85% | +1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -1.48% | +1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -4.20% | -3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 2.18% | +1.03% |
Volatility
IMTM vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 2.35%. This indicates that IMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTM | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 2.35% | +3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 10.73% | +4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 14.19% | +2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 18.20% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 18.65% | -1.01% |
IMTM vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMTM vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison
IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than MMTM's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | 4.23% | 4.70% | 2.93% | 2.29% | 2.68% | 2.51% | 0.97% | 2.13% | 2.36% | 1.92% | 2.75% | 1.56% |
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 0.78% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMTM and MMTM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMTM has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to MMTM (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs MMTM's -33.85%.
On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 15.00% vs 10.29% for IMTM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 15.00% return vs 10.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.
IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 0.78% for MMTM.
IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.12% for MMTM.
MMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMTM and MMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer