PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTM vs. IQDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTM vs. IQDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly higher than IQDG's 2.22% return. Over the past 10 years, IMTM has outperformed IQDG with an annualized return of 9.71%, while IQDG has yielded a comparatively lower 7.66% annualized return.


IMTM

1D
1.06%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
8.92%
6M
11.17%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
9.71%

IQDG

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
2.22%
6M
5.07%
1Y
10.58%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
7.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. IQDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
8.92%34.50%12.17%13.89%-16.81%3.50%22.17%24.52%-14.31%25.46%
IQDG
WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.22%24.19%-3.38%20.76%-19.97%12.28%16.58%30.03%-16.81%30.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and IQDG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2016

0.85

The correlation between IMTM and IQDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMTM vs. IQDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMTM
IQDG

Financial Services

29.6%
15.5%

Industrials

17.5%
24.7%

Technology

11.4%
9.9%

Energy

9.4%
4.2%

Basic Materials

9.3%
5.3%

Healthcare

9.0%
9.7%

Utilities

6.4%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.5%

Communication Services

1.9%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
19.3%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.3%

Financial Services

IMTM
29.6%
IQDG
15.5%

Industrials

IMTM
17.5%
IQDG
24.7%

Technology

IMTM
11.4%
IQDG
9.9%

Energy

IMTM
9.4%
IQDG
4.2%

Basic Materials

IMTM
9.3%
IQDG
5.3%

Healthcare

IMTM
9.0%
IQDG
9.7%

Utilities

IMTM
6.4%
IQDG
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

IMTM
2.4%
IQDG
4.5%

Communication Services

IMTM
1.9%
IQDG
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IMTM
1.8%
IQDG
19.3%

Real Estate

IMTM
1.2%
IQDG
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTM vs. IQDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM
IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

IQDG
IQDG Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
IQDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IQDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. IQDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMTMIQDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.12

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

0.86

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

2.79

+3.66

IMTM vs. IQDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the IQDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and IQDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMTMIQDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.65

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.20

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.44

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.45

+0.04

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. IQDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum IQDG drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and IQDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTMIQDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-34.97%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-12.35%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-18.12%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-34.97%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.66%

-34.97%

+2.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-4.59%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-7.52%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

3.80%

-0.58%

Volatility

IMTM vs. IQDG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund (IQDG) at 4.54%. This indicates that IMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTMIQDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

4.54%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.47%

13.55%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

16.39%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

17.83%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

17.54%

+0.09%

IMTM vs. IQDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IQDG's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMTM vs. IQDG - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than IQDG's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMTM
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
4.32%4.70%2.93%2.29%2.68%2.51%0.97%2.13%2.36%1.92%2.75%1.56%
IQDG
WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.16%2.28%2.60%1.76%4.18%2.67%1.65%1.95%1.96%1.71%1.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMTM and IQDG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMTM has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to IQDG (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs IQDG's -34.97%.

On 10-year performance, IMTM leads with 9.71% vs 7.66% for IQDG. On fees, IMTM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IQDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMTM has performed better with a 9.71% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMTM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IQDG.

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 2.16% for IQDG.

IMTM is categorized as Momentum, while IQDG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while IQDG tracks WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.42% for IQDG.

IMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTM and IQDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer