IMTG vs. VMBS
IMTG (Invesco Agency MBS ETF) and VMBS (Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. IMTG is actively managed, while VMBS is passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IMTG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VMBS.
Performance
IMTG vs. VMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IMTG
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VMBS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 0.49%
- 10Y*
- 1.36%
IMTG vs. VMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | -1.06% |
VMBS Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTG and VMBS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTG vs. VMBS — Risk / Return Rank
IMTG
VMBS
IMTG vs. VMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMTG | VMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.82 | 0.46 | -1.28 |
Drawdowns
IMTG vs. VMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, smaller than the maximum VMBS drawdown of -17.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTG and VMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTG | VMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -17.47% | +14.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -1.29% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -2.49% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.80% | — |
Volatility
IMTG vs. VMBS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTG | VMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.71% | 4.37% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 6.77% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 5.40% | -0.69% |
IMTG vs. VMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VMBS's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMTG vs. VMBS - Dividend Comparison
IMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than VMBS's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMBS Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 4.18% | 4.20% | 3.94% | 3.31% | 2.35% | 1.02% | 2.01% | 2.77% | 2.72% | 2.16% | 2.10% | 2.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IMTG and VMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VMBS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VMBS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for IMTG.
VMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 0.85% for IMTG.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for IMTG and 0.04% for VMBS.
Find the right allocation for IMTG and VMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer