IMTG vs. SPMO
IMTG (Invesco Agency MBS ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMTG is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Invesco, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. IMTG is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMTG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
IMTG vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IMTG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- -3.15%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- 6M
- 21.88%
- YTD
- 22.29%
- 1Y
- 29.78%
- 3Y*
- 39.07%
- 5Y*
- 20.99%
- 10Y*
- 20.30%
IMTG vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | -1.17% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 22.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTG and SPMO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTG vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
IMTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPMO
IMTG vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMTG | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMTG vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTG and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTG | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -30.95% | +28.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -10.13% | +8.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -4.59% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.67% | — |
Volatility
IMTG vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTG | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.64% | 22.58% | -17.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.64% | 20.33% | -15.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.64% | 20.83% | -16.19% |
IMTG vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMTG vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
IMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than SPMO's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.72% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMTG and SPMO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for IMTG.
IMTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.72% for SPMO.
IMTG is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while SPMO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for IMTG and 0.13% for SPMO.
Find the right allocation for IMTG and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer