IMTG vs. MBB
IMTG (Invesco Agency MBS ETF) and MBB (iShares MBS Bond ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. IMTG is actively managed, while MBB is passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IMTG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for MBB.
Performance
IMTG vs. MBB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IMTG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBB
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 6.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- 1.30%
IMTG vs. MBB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | -1.11% |
MBB iShares MBS Bond ETF | -1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTG and MBB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTG vs. MBB — Risk / Return Rank
IMTG
MBB
IMTG vs. MBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and iShares MBS Bond ETF (MBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMTG | MBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | 0.58 | -1.45 |
Drawdowns
IMTG vs. MBB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, smaller than the maximum MBB drawdown of -17.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTG and MBB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTG | MBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -17.64% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -1.52% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -2.35% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility
IMTG vs. MBB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTG | MBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.74% | 4.51% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 6.81% | -2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 5.31% | -0.57% |
IMTG vs. MBB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than MBB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMTG vs. MBB - Dividend Comparison
IMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than MBB's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MBB iShares MBS Bond ETF | 4.28% | 4.21% | 3.94% | 3.40% | 2.31% | 1.05% | 2.10% | 2.77% | 2.64% | 2.23% | 2.58% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, IMTG and MBB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MBB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MBB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for IMTG.
MBB has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.85% for IMTG.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for IMTG and 0.06% for MBB.
Find the right allocation for IMTG and MBB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer