IMSU.L vs. IUMS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IMSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IUMS.L (iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IMSU.L is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while IUMS.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMSU.L returned 6.03%/yr vs 6.04%/yr for IUMS.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

IMSU.L vs. IUMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IMSU.L is traded in GBp, while IUMS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IMSU.L having a 12.66% return and IUMS.L slightly higher at 12.98%.

IMSU.L

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 12.66%
• 6M: 15.92%
• 1Y: 19.35%
• 3Y*: 8.18%
• 5Y*: 6.03%
• 10Y*: —

IUMS.L

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 12.98%
• 6M: 15.93%
• 1Y: 19.40%
• 3Y*: 8.27%
• 5Y*: 6.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMSU.L vs. IUMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMSU.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	12.66%	3.37%	0.69%	6.26%	-1.35%	28.63%	16.34%	19.09%	-10.83%	10.05%
IUMS.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	12.94%	3.00%	0.81%	6.79%	-1.42%	28.13%	17.00%	18.25%	-10.68%	10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IMSU.L and IUMS.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017	0.95

The correlation between IMSU.L and IUMS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMSU.L vs. IUMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMSU.L	IUMS.L
Basic Materials	91.4%	91.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	8.5%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IMSU.L vs. IUMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMSU.L

IMSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 37
IMSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IMSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
IMSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 35
IMSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IMSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 39

IUMS.L

IUMS.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
IUMS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
IUMS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
IUMS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
IUMS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
IUMS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMSU.L vs. IUMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IMSU.L	IUMS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.20	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	1.71	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.21	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	1.78	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.00	6.15	-0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IMSU.L vs. IUMS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the IUMS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMSU.L and IUMS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IMSU.L	IUMS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	1.20	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.35	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.45	+0.02

Drawdowns

IMSU.L vs. IUMS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMSU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.25%, roughly equal to the maximum IUMS.L drawdown of -28.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMSU.L and IUMS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMSU.L	IUMS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.25%	-28.94%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.76%	-10.82%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.70%	-21.83%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.70%	-21.83%	+0.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.35%	-2.96%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.55%	-5.57%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	3.15%	+0.07%

Volatility

IMSU.L vs. IUMS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) is 4.89%, while iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that IMSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMSU.L	IUMS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	5.73%	-0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.86%	13.27%	-1.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.68%	16.08%	-1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.33%	17.42%	-1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.46%	19.28%	-0.82%

IMSU.L vs. IUMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IMSU.L and IUMS.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IMSU.L vs. IUMS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMSU.L nor IUMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMSU.L and IUMS.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, IMSU.L and IUMS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, IMSU.L or IUMS.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMSU.L or IUMS.L?

IMSU.L and IUMS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

What is the main difference between IMSU.L and IUMS.L?

IMSU.L is categorized as Materials, while IUMS.L is S&P 500. IMSU.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while IUMS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Index NTR.