IMST vs. ETHW
IMST (Bitwise Funds Trust) and ETHW (Bitwise Ethereum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMST is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise, while ETHW is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IMST returned -62.31% vs -31.71% for ETHW. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMST charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHW.
Performance
IMST vs. ETHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMST achieves a -14.98% return, which is significantly higher than ETHW's -39.45% return.
IMST
- 1D
- -5.79%
- 1M
- -25.22%
- YTD
- -14.98%
- 6M
- -28.07%
- 1Y
- -62.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHW
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.65%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.65%
- 1Y
- -31.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMST vs. ETHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IMST Bitwise Funds Trust | -14.98% | -44.26% |
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | -39.45% | 66.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMST and ETHW is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IMST and ETHW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMST vs. ETHW — Risk / Return Rank
IMST
ETHW
IMST vs. ETHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) and Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMST | ETHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.96 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | -0.51 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | -0.84 | -0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMST | ETHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | -0.47 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.80 | -0.41 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
IMST vs. ETHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMST drawdown since its inception was -69.86%, which is greater than ETHW's maximum drawdown of -64.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMST and ETHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMST | ETHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.86% | -64.04% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.86% | -62.87% | -6.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.74% | -62.87% | -3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.27% | -32.65% | -2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.22% | 37.74% | +8.48% |
Volatility
IMST vs. ETHW - Volatility Comparison
Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) has a higher volatility of 14.83% compared to Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) at 10.08%. This indicates that IMST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMST | ETHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.83% | 10.08% | +4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.06% | 46.02% | -1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.91% | 68.33% | -11.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.73% | 72.13% | -12.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.73% | 72.13% | -12.40% |
IMST vs. ETHW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHW's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMST vs. ETHW - Dividend Comparison
IMST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 221.80%, while ETHW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMST Bitwise Funds Trust | 221.80% | 195.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMST and ETHW have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMST has higher volatility (14.83%) compared to ETHW (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMST dropped -69.86% vs ETHW's -64.04%.
On 1-year performance, ETHW leads with -31.71% vs -62.31% for IMST. On fees, ETHW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHW has been the lower-risk option at 10.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHW has performed better with a -31.71% return vs -62.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IMST.
IMST has the higher dividend yield at 221.80%, compared with 0.00% for ETHW.
IMST is categorized as Derivative Income, while ETHW is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IMST and 0.20% for ETHW.
ETHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMST and ETHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer