PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHW vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHW vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with ETHW at -39.45% and FETH at -39.45%.


ETHW

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.65%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.65%
1Y
-31.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FETH

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
-31.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHW vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETHW
Bitwise Ethereum ETF
-39.45%-11.26%-3.54%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-39.45%-11.37%-3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHW and FETH is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

1.00

The correlation between ETHW and FETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHW vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHW
ETHW Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHW Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHW vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHWFETHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.47

-0.47

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.32

-0.32

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.97

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

-0.51

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.84

-0.84

0.00

ETHW vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHW Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is comparable to the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHW and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHWFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

-0.47

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

-0.41

0.00

Drawdowns

ETHW vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHW drawdown since its inception was -64.04%, roughly equal to the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHW and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHWFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.04%

-64.00%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.87%

-62.95%

+0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.87%

-62.95%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.65%

-32.73%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.74%

37.82%

-0.08%

Volatility

ETHW vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) have volatilities of 10.08% and 9.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHWFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.08%

9.99%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.02%

46.01%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.33%

68.50%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.13%

72.27%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.13%

72.27%

-0.14%

ETHW vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ETHW vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETHW nor FETH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, ETHW and FETH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ETHW has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to FETH (9.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHW dropped -64.04% vs FETH's -64.00%.

On 1-year performance, ETHW leads with -31.71% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ETHW has performed better with a -31.71% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ETHW.

ETHW and FETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETHW and 0.00% for FETH.

FETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHW and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer