IMST vs. ACYS
IMST (Bitwise Funds Trust) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMST charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
IMST vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IMST
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -18.69%
- 6M
- -35.66%
- YTD
- -31.57%
- 1Y
- -72.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMST vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IMST Bitwise Funds Trust | -37.61% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMST and ACYS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMST vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank
IMST
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IMST vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Funds Trust (IMST) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMST | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMST vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMST drawdown since its inception was -75.63%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMST and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMST | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.63% | -0.63% | -75.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.23% | -0.24% | -72.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.06% | -0.14% | -37.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.48% | — | — |
Volatility
IMST vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMST | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.28% | 3.45% | +56.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.84% | 3.45% | +57.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.84% | 3.45% | +57.39% |
IMST vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMST vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
IMST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 253.23%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% |
IMST Bitwise Funds Trust | 253.23% | 195.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMST and ACYS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IMST.
IMST has the higher dividend yield at 253.23%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IMST and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for IMST and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer