IMRA vs. TLTX
IMRA (Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMRA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise, while TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMRA charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
IMRA vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMRA achieves a 30.26% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -0.36% return.
IMRA
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 30.26%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- -32.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -1.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMRA vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 30.26% | -52.78% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | -0.36% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMRA and TLTX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMRA vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank
IMRA
TLTX
IMRA vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMRA | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMRA | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | 0.63 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
IMRA vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMRA drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMRA and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMRA | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -6.35% | -55.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.71% | -4.05% | -36.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.21% | -2.27% | -25.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.93% | — | — |
Volatility
IMRA vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMRA | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.89% | 9.14% | +50.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.39% | 9.14% | +52.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.39% | 9.14% | +52.25% |
IMRA vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMRA has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMRA vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
IMRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 108.66%, more than TLTX's 15.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 108.66% | 188.74% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 15.79% | 7.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMRA and TLTX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for IMRA.
IMRA has the higher dividend yield at 108.66%, compared with 15.79% for TLTX.
IMRA is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLTX is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for IMRA and 0.29% for TLTX.
Find the right allocation for IMRA and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer