IMRA vs. CLNK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IMRA (Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) and CLNK (Bitwise Chainlink ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMRA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise, while CLNK is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Chainlink (LINK) spot price. IMRA is actively managed, while CLNK is passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMRA charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for CLNK.

Performance

IMRA vs. CLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IMRA

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 9.36%
• YTD: 30.26%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: -32.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLNK

• 1D: -4.18%
• 1M: -12.86%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMRA vs. CLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	8.33%
CLNK Bitwise Chainlink ETF	-41.92%

Correlation

The correlation between IMRA and CLNK is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026	0.54

Return for Risk

IMRA vs. CLNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMRA

IMRA Risk / Return Rank: 5
IMRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
IMRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
IMRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5
IMRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
IMRA Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMRA vs. CLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IMRA	CLNK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IMRA	CLNK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.19	-1.14	+0.95

Drawdowns

IMRA vs. CLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMRA drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than CLNK's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMRA and CLNK.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMRA	CLNK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.55%	-43.56%	-17.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.71%	-41.92%	+1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.21%	-32.34%	+4.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IMRA	CLNK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.89%	67.16%	-7.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.39%	67.16%	-5.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.39%	67.16%	-5.77%

IMRA vs. CLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMRA has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CLNK's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMRA vs. CLNK - Dividend Comparison

IMRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 108.66%, while CLNK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CLNK Bitwise Chainlink ETF	0.00%	0.00%
IMRA Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	108.66%	188.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMRA and CLNK in my portfolio?

IMRA and CLNK have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IMRA or CLNK?

On fees, CLNK is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMRA or CLNK?

CLNK is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for IMRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMRA or CLNK?

IMRA has the higher dividend yield at 108.66%, compared with 0.00% for CLNK.

What is the main difference between IMRA and CLNK?

IMRA is categorized as Derivative Income, while CLNK is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for IMRA and 0.34% for CLNK.