PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLNK vs. BWOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLNK vs. BWOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CLNK

1D
-4.58%
1M
-20.30%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BWOW

1D
-5.22%
1M
-24.37%
YTD
-33.12%
6M
-39.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLNK vs. BWOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
CLNK
Bitwise Chainlink ETF
-45.91%
BWOW
Bitwise Dogecoin ETF
-45.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CLNK and BWOW is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLNK vs. BWOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLNK vs. BWOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLNK vs. BWOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLNK drawdown since its inception was -48.04%, roughly equal to the maximum BWOW drawdown of -49.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLNK and BWOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLNKBWOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.04%

-49.59%

+1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.41%

-49.59%

+3.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.42%

-30.13%

-3.29%

Volatility

CLNK vs. BWOW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLNKBWOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.99%

73.06%

-5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.99%

73.06%

-5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.99%

73.06%

-5.07%

CLNK vs. BWOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLNK and BWOW have an expense ratio of 0.34%.


Dividends

CLNK vs. BWOW - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLNK nor BWOW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CLNK and BWOW have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.34% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLNK and BWOW have the same expense ratio: 0.34% per year.

CLNK and BWOW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK) spot price, while BWOW tracks DOGE/USD Exchange Rate - Benchmark Price Return.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLNK and BWOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer