PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLNK vs. ZCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLNK vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CLNK

1D
-4.18%
1M
-12.86%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZCSH

1D
-5.29%
1M
47.90%
YTD
41.32%
6M
72.54%
1Y
1,002.48%
3Y*
185.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLNK vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CLNK and ZCSH is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026

0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLNK vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLNK

ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLNK vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLNK vs. ZCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLNKZCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.14

0.10

-1.23

Drawdowns

CLNK vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLNK drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLNK and ZCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLNKZCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-93.73%

+50.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.92%

-15.71%

-26.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.34%

-74.41%

+42.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.49%

Volatility

CLNK vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLNKZCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.16%

166.02%

-98.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.16%

136.87%

-69.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.16%

136.87%

-69.71%

CLNK vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLNK has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLNK vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLNK nor ZCSH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CLNK and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CLNK is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLNK is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

CLNK and ZCSH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK) spot price, while ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC). They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CLNK and 2.50% for ZCSH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLNK and ZCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer