IMPUF vs. GDWN.L
IMPUF (Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd) and GDWN.L (Goodwin plc) are both stocks. IMPUF operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while GDWN.L operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, IMPUF returned -2.36%/yr vs 43.34%/yr for GDWN.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IMPUF vs. GDWN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IMPUF is traded in USD, while GDWN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GDWN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMPUF achieves a -24.09% return, which is significantly higher than GDWN.L's -25.54% return.
IMPUF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -14.46%
- YTD
- -24.09%
- 6M
- -27.82%
- 1Y
- 46.96%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- -2.36%
- 10Y*
- —
GDWN.L
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 13.45%
- YTD
- -25.54%
- 6M
- -20.86%
- 1Y
- 115.33%
- 3Y*
- 59.60%
- 5Y*
- 43.34%
- 10Y*
- 26.46%
IMPUF vs. GDWN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMPUF Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd | -24.09% | 200.45% | 12.15% | -60.02% | -5.41% | 12.03% | 50.30% | 410.99% |
GDWN.L Goodwin plc | -25.54% | 205.15% | 37.01% | 86.61% | -5.93% | 8.17% | 8.38% | 3.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMPUF and GDWN.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
IMPUF:
$10.40B
GDWN.L:
£1.21B
IMPUF:
-ZAR 9.66
GDWN.L:
£7.88
IMPUF:
0.90
GDWN.L:
2.69
IMPUF:
1.77
GDWN.L:
11.93
IMPUF:
ZAR 188.26B
GDWN.L:
£448.99M
IMPUF:
ZAR 17.78B
GDWN.L:
£210.33M
IMPUF:
ZAR 29.69B
GDWN.L:
£107.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMPUF vs. GDWN.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMPUF
GDWN.L
IMPUF vs. GDWN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IMPUF) and Goodwin plc (GDWN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMPUF | GDWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.90 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.04 | 4.29 | -2.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMPUF vs. GDWN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMPUF drawdown since its inception was -80.80%, smaller than the maximum GDWN.L drawdown of -99.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMPUF and GDWN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMPUF | GDWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.80% | -99.44% | +18.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.24% | -60.46% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.31% | -60.46% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.84% | -60.46% | -19.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.98% | -82.31% | +34.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.80% | -95.30% | +53.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.08% | 26.79% | -3.71% |
Volatility
IMPUF vs. GDWN.L - Volatility Comparison
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IMPUF) and Goodwin plc (GDWN.L) have volatilities of 16.05% and 15.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMPUF | GDWN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.05% | 15.49% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.82% | 58.94% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.72% | 75.73% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.24% | 49.12% | +15.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.01% | 45.56% | +61.45% |
Dividends
IMPUF vs. GDWN.L - Dividend Comparison
IMPUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than GDWN.L's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDWN.L Goodwin plc | 5.05% | 3.47% | 1.58% | 1.93% | 1.62% | 3.17% | 2.68% | 3.23% | 3.31% | 2.09% | 2.42% | 2.30% |
IMPUF Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd | 2.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.80% | 7.85% | 10.80% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
IMPUF vs. GDWN.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd and Goodwin plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IMPUF vs. GDWN.L - Profitability Comparison
IMPUF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 13.35B and revenue of 60.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.
GDWN.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Goodwin plc reported a gross profit of 66.92M and revenue of 135.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.4%.
IMPUF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 13.33B and revenue of 60.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.
GDWN.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Goodwin plc reported an operating income of 37.16M and revenue of 135.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.4%.
IMPUF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported a net income of 9.25B and revenue of 60.36B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.
GDWN.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Goodwin plc reported a net income of 26.41M and revenue of 135.61M, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMPUF and GDWN.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IMPUF and GDWN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer