IMPUF vs. CBG.L
IMPUF (Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd) and CBG.L (Close Brothers Group plc) are both stocks. IMPUF operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while CBG.L operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, IMPUF returned -1.71%/yr vs -20.62%/yr for CBG.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IMPUF vs. CBG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IMPUF is traded in USD, while CBG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CBG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMPUF achieves a -11.27% return, which is significantly higher than CBG.L's -14.35% return.
IMPUF
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- -11.27%
- 6M
- 20.64%
- 1Y
- 91.01%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- -1.71%
- 10Y*
- —
CBG.L
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- -14.35%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 36.69%
- 3Y*
- -19.15%
- 5Y*
- -20.62%
- 10Y*
- -7.35%
IMPUF vs. CBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMPUF Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd | -11.27% | 200.45% | 12.15% | -60.02% | -5.41% | 12.03% | 50.30% | 410.99% |
CBG.L Close Brothers Group plc | -14.35% | 137.90% | -70.75% | -13.47% | -28.74% | 4.69% | -7.43% | 13.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMPUF and CBG.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2019 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
IMPUF:
$12.15B
CBG.L:
£671.11M
IMPUF:
-$9.66
CBG.L:
-£0.82
IMPUF:
0.06
CBG.L:
0.36
IMPUF:
0.13
CBG.L:
0.46
IMPUF:
$188.26B
CBG.L:
£1.84B
IMPUF:
$17.78B
CBG.L:
£1.58B
IMPUF:
$29.69B
CBG.L:
£174.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMPUF vs. CBG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMPUF
CBG.L
IMPUF vs. CBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IMPUF) and Close Brothers Group plc (CBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMPUF | CBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.69 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 1.40 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.17 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 0.97 | +1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 2.26 | +2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMPUF | CBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.69 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | -0.41 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | -0.03 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
IMPUF vs. CBG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMPUF drawdown since its inception was -80.80%, smaller than the maximum CBG.L drawdown of -87.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMPUF and CBG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMPUF | CBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.80% | -87.97% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.87% | -37.83% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.31% | -80.26% | +20.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.84% | -87.92% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -87.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.20% | -69.18% | +29.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.79% | -28.73% | -13.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.51% | 16.20% | +4.31% |
Volatility
IMPUF vs. CBG.L - Volatility Comparison
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd (IMPUF) has a higher volatility of 17.55% compared to Close Brothers Group plc (CBG.L) at 12.77%. This indicates that IMPUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMPUF | CBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.55% | 12.77% | +4.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.16% | 34.84% | +26.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.74% | 52.89% | +24.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.06% | 50.92% | +13.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.33% | 42.82% | +64.51% |
Dividends
IMPUF vs. CBG.L - Dividend Comparison
IMPUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, while CBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBG.L Close Brothers Group plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.50% | 6.30% | 4.27% | 2.89% | 4.13% | 4.38% | 4.14% | 3.94% | 4.00% |
IMPUF Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.80% | 7.85% | 10.80% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
IMPUF vs. CBG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd and Close Brothers Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IMPUF vs. CBG.L - Profitability Comparison
IMPUF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 13.35B and revenue of 60.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.
CBG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Close Brothers Group plc reported a gross profit of 78.50M and revenue of 358.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.
IMPUF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 13.33B and revenue of 60.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.
CBG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Close Brothers Group plc reported an operating income of -65.50M and revenue of 358.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.3%.
IMPUF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd reported a net income of 9.25B and revenue of 60.36B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.
CBG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Close Brothers Group plc reported a net income of -64.40M and revenue of 358.00M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMPUF and CBG.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IMPUF and CBG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer