PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDWN.L vs. YRM.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GDWN.L vs. YRM.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Goodwin plc (GDWN.L) and Rosetti Marino SpA (YRM.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GDWN.L is traded in GBp, while YRM.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the YRM.MI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDWN.L achieves a -32.11% return, which is significantly lower than YRM.MI's -6.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GDWN.L having a 25.47% annualized return and YRM.MI not far behind at 24.83%.


GDWN.L

1D
-3.36%
1M
19.44%
YTD
-32.11%
6M
-31.14%
1Y
104.92%
3Y*
51.60%
5Y*
40.30%
10Y*
25.47%

YRM.MI

1D
0.01%
1M
2.03%
YTD
-6.26%
6M
-5.78%
1Y
208.38%
3Y*
102.32%
5Y*
49.76%
10Y*
24.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDWN.L vs. YRM.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDWN.L
Goodwin plc
-32.11%183.87%39.33%77.26%5.33%9.16%5.16%21.66%28.51%18.73%
YRM.MI
Rosetti Marino SpA
-6.26%517.26%-3.02%46.91%-4.84%-2.83%-5.87%-5.87%18.11%8.35%

Correlation

The correlation between GDWN.L and YRM.MI is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDWN.L vs. YRM.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDWN.L
GDWN.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GDWN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDWN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDWN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GDWN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDWN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

YRM.MI
YRM.MI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
YRM.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YRM.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
YRM.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
YRM.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
YRM.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDWN.L vs. YRM.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goodwin plc (GDWN.L) and Rosetti Marino SpA (YRM.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDWN.LYRM.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.68

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

4.90

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.29

8.36

-4.08

GDWN.L vs. YRM.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDWN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the YRM.MI Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDWN.L and YRM.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDWN.LYRM.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

3.19

-1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

1.43

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.96

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.80

-0.15

Drawdowns

GDWN.L vs. YRM.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDWN.L drawdown since its inception was -65.24%, which is greater than YRM.MI's maximum drawdown of -42.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDWN.L and YRM.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDWN.LYRM.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.24%

-42.57%

-22.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.56%

-42.57%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.56%

-42.57%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.56%

-42.57%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.56%

-42.57%

-16.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.61%

-34.04%

-13.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.99%

-10.84%

-8.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.38%

24.91%

-0.53%

Volatility

GDWN.L vs. YRM.MI - Volatility Comparison

Goodwin plc (GDWN.L) has a higher volatility of 18.92% compared to Rosetti Marino SpA (YRM.MI) at 9.04%. This indicates that GDWN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YRM.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDWN.LYRM.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.92%

9.04%

+9.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.66%

20.77%

+56.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.64%

67.00%

+14.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.10%

34.44%

+15.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.54%

25.66%

+19.88%

Dividends

GDWN.L vs. YRM.MI - Dividend Comparison

GDWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than YRM.MI's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDWN.L
Goodwin plc
5.65%3.47%1.58%1.93%1.62%3.17%2.68%3.23%3.31%2.09%2.42%2.30%
YRM.MI
Rosetti Marino SpA
1.16%0.72%2.04%0.57%0.00%0.00%1.42%1.75%1.22%0.84%0.35%2.87%

Financials

GDWN.L vs. YRM.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Goodwin plc and Rosetti Marino SpA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. GDWN.L values in GBp, YRM.MI values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


GDWN.L and YRM.MI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDWN.L and YRM.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer