PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMPP vs. TIGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMPP vs. TIGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) and UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMPP achieves a 42.82% return, which is significantly higher than TIGR's -51.15% return.


IMPP

1D
-1.34%
1M
2.58%
YTD
42.82%
6M
19.40%
1Y
70.63%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
10Y*

TIGR

1D
-6.04%
1M
-30.40%
YTD
-51.15%
6M
-46.07%
1Y
-43.39%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
-29.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMPP vs. TIGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum Inc.
42.82%20.27%14.02%-15.38%-88.73%-54.85%
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Limited
-51.15%47.99%46.15%29.62%-30.55%-18.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IMPP and TIGR is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMPP:

$246.16M

TIGR:

$831.15M

EPS

IMPP:

$1.66

TIGR:

$0.62

PE Ratio

IMPP:

3.11

TIGR:

7.59

PS Ratio

IMPP:

1.09

TIGR:

1.34

PB Ratio

IMPP:

0.44

TIGR:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMPP:

$190.63M

TIGR:

$645.56M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMPP:

$65.04M

TIGR:

$533.82M

EBITDA (TTM)

IMPP:

$91.98M

TIGR:

$236.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMPP vs. TIGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMPP
IMPP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IMPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMPP Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IMPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMPP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

TIGR
TIGR Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TIGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TIGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIGR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMPP vs. TIGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) and UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMPPTIGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.91

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

-0.66

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

-1.35

+4.22

IMPP vs. TIGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the TIGR Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMPP and TIGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMPPTIGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

-0.65

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.32

-0.12

-0.20

Drawdowns

IMPP vs. TIGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMPP drawdown since its inception was -98.75%, which is greater than TIGR's maximum drawdown of -93.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMPP and TIGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMPPTIGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.75%

-93.65%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.29%

-66.44%

+17.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.57%

-66.44%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.67%

-87.28%

-7.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.70%

-77.93%

-15.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.66%

32.27%

-7.61%

Volatility

IMPP vs. TIGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) is 16.90%, while UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) has a volatility of 35.72%. This indicates that IMPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMPPTIGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.90%

35.72%

-18.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.15%

48.12%

-9.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.73%

66.92%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

132.47%

83.05%

+49.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

132.47%

89.78%

+42.69%

Dividends

IMPP vs. TIGR - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMPP nor TIGR has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%22.63%
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IMPP vs. TIGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Petroleum Inc. and UP Fintech Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
61.71M
155.34M
(IMPP) Total Revenue
(TIGR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IMPP vs. TIGR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Imperial Petroleum Inc. and UP Fintech Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
45.9%
95.0%
Portfolio components
IMPP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Petroleum Inc. reported a gross profit of 28.34M and revenue of 61.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.9%.

TIGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 147.59M and revenue of 155.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.0%.

IMPP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Petroleum Inc. reported an operating income of 26.50M and revenue of 61.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.

TIGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported an operating income of 65.89M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.

IMPP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Petroleum Inc. reported a net income of 28.02M and revenue of 61.71M, resulting in a net margin of 45.4%.

TIGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a net income of -26.92M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IMPP and TIGR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIGR has higher volatility (35.72%) compared to IMPP (16.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMPP dropped -98.75% vs TIGR's -93.65%.

IMPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMPP and TIGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer