TIGR vs. SCHW
TIGR (UP Fintech Holding Limited) and SCHW (The Charles Schwab Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Capital Markets industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, TIGR returned -29.58%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for SCHW. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TIGR vs. SCHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIGR achieves a -51.36% return, which is significantly lower than SCHW's -6.10% return.
TIGR
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- -51.36%
- 6M
- -48.45%
- 1Y
- -42.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.99%
- 5Y*
- -29.58%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHW
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 6M
- -7.27%
- 1Y
- 6.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
TIGR vs. SCHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited | -51.36% | 47.99% | 46.15% | 29.62% | -30.55% | -38.16% | 123.66% | -56.23% |
SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | -6.10% | 36.65% | 9.17% | -15.97% | 0.11% | 60.23% | 13.57% | 5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIGR and SCHW is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
TIGR:
$827.59M
SCHW:
$163.23B
TIGR:
$0.62
SCHW:
$5.26
TIGR:
7.55
SCHW:
17.71
TIGR:
0.09
SCHW:
1.01
TIGR:
1.33
SCHW:
6.90
TIGR:
0.98
SCHW:
60.46K
TIGR:
$645.56M
SCHW:
$24.17B
TIGR:
$533.82M
SCHW:
$18.86B
TIGR:
$236.90M
SCHW:
$13.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIGR vs. SCHW — Risk / Return Rank
TIGR
SCHW
TIGR vs. SCHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) and The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIGR | SCHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.07 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 0.34 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 0.78 | -1.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIGR vs. SCHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIGR drawdown since its inception was -93.65%, which is greater than SCHW's maximum drawdown of -86.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGR and SCHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIGR | SCHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.65% | -86.79% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.44% | -19.83% | -46.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.44% | -27.11% | -39.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.04% | -49.70% | -42.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.34% | -12.49% | -74.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.95% | -35.52% | -42.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.36% | 8.73% | +26.63% |
Volatility
TIGR vs. SCHW - Volatility Comparison
UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) has a higher volatility of 34.98% compared to The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) at 8.14%. This indicates that TIGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIGR | SCHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.98% | 8.14% | +26.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.23% | 20.17% | +28.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.73% | 24.45% | +42.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.24% | 32.17% | +50.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.40% | 33.20% | +57.20% |
Dividends
TIGR vs. SCHW - Dividend Comparison
TIGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 1.27% | 1.08% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.01% | 0.86% | 1.36% | 1.43% | 1.11% | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.73% |
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TIGR vs. SCHW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UP Fintech Holding Limited and The Charles Schwab Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TIGR vs. SCHW - Profitability Comparison
TIGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 147.59M and revenue of 155.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.0%.
SCHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 3.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
TIGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported an operating income of 65.89M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.
SCHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation reported an operating income of -730.00M and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.2%.
TIGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a net income of -26.92M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.
SCHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation reported a net income of 2.48B and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in a net margin of 78.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TIGR and SCHW have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIGR has higher volatility (34.98%) compared to SCHW (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIGR dropped -93.65% vs SCHW's -86.79%.
SCHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIGR and SCHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer