IMPP vs. ERIC
IMPP (Imperial Petroleum Inc.) and ERIC (Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)) are both stocks. IMPP operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while ERIC operates in Communication Equipment (Technology). Over the past 3 years, IMPP returned 17.44%/yr vs 41.47%/yr for ERIC. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IMPP vs. ERIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMPP achieves a 42.82% return, which is significantly higher than ERIC's 38.32% return.
IMPP
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 42.82%
- 6M
- 19.40%
- 1Y
- 70.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERIC
- 1D
- -4.22%
- 1M
- 13.16%
- YTD
- 38.32%
- 6M
- 37.90%
- 1Y
- 60.00%
- 3Y*
- 41.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
IMPP vs. ERIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMPP Imperial Petroleum Inc. | 42.82% | 20.27% | 14.02% | -15.38% | -88.73% | -54.85% |
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 38.32% | 24.14% | 33.36% | 13.40% | -44.43% | 4.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMPP and ERIC is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
IMPP:
$246.16M
ERIC:
$43.99B
IMPP:
$1.66
ERIC:
$7.42
IMPP:
3.11
ERIC:
1.77
IMPP:
1.09
ERIC:
0.19
IMPP:
0.44
ERIC:
0.43
IMPP:
$190.63M
ERIC:
$229.49B
IMPP:
$65.04M
ERIC:
$110.27B
IMPP:
$91.98M
ERIC:
$46.17B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMPP vs. ERIC — Risk / Return Rank
IMPP
ERIC
IMPP vs. ERIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMPP | ERIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 3.82 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | 9.84 | -6.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMPP | ERIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.73 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.12 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
IMPP vs. ERIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMPP drawdown since its inception was -98.75%, roughly equal to the maximum ERIC drawdown of -98.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMPP and ERIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMPP | ERIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.75% | -98.59% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.29% | -15.79% | -33.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.57% | -22.61% | -45.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.67% | -81.26% | -13.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.70% | -67.76% | -25.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.66% | 6.12% | +18.54% |
Volatility
IMPP vs. ERIC - Volatility Comparison
Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) has a higher volatility of 16.90% compared to Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) at 11.58%. This indicates that IMPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMPP | ERIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.90% | 11.58% | +5.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.15% | 22.74% | +15.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.73% | 34.92% | +26.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 132.47% | 34.38% | +98.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 132.47% | 35.15% | +97.32% |
Dividends
IMPP vs. ERIC - Dividend Comparison
IMPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 2.38% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 4.07% | 4.22% | 2.15% | 1.36% | 1.24% | 1.42% | 1.67% | 5.14% | 5.30% |
IMPP Imperial Petroleum Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 22.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
IMPP vs. ERIC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Petroleum Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IMPP vs. ERIC - Profitability Comparison
IMPP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Petroleum Inc. reported a gross profit of 28.34M and revenue of 61.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.9%.
ERIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) reported a gross profit of 24.60B and revenue of 51.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.1%.
IMPP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Petroleum Inc. reported an operating income of 26.50M and revenue of 61.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.
ERIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) reported an operating income of 5.48B and revenue of 51.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
IMPP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Petroleum Inc. reported a net income of 28.02M and revenue of 61.71M, resulting in a net margin of 45.4%.
ERIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) reported a net income of 920.33M and revenue of 51.13B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMPP and ERIC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMPP has higher volatility (16.90%) compared to ERIC (11.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMPP dropped -98.75% vs ERIC's -98.59%.
ERIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMPP and ERIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer