PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERIC vs. NOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ERIC vs. NOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) and Nokia Corporation (NOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERIC achieves a 32.02% return, which is significantly lower than NOK's 124.44% return. Over the past 10 years, ERIC has underperformed NOK with an annualized return of 7.69%, while NOK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return.


ERIC

1D
-5.92%
1M
4.49%
YTD
32.02%
6M
34.10%
1Y
52.52%
3Y*
40.18%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
7.69%

NOK

1D
-13.48%
1M
9.02%
YTD
124.44%
6M
139.23%
1Y
173.88%
3Y*
58.36%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
12.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERIC vs. NOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERIC
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
32.02%24.14%33.36%13.40%-44.43%-7.26%38.51%0.17%35.45%16.57%
NOK
Nokia Corporation
124.44%50.85%34.33%-23.97%-24.44%59.08%5.39%-34.91%30.04%-0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ERIC and NOK is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1994

0.58

The correlation between ERIC and NOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ERIC:

$41.99B

NOK:

$82.29B

EPS

ERIC:

$7.42

NOK:

$0.14

PE Ratio

ERIC:

1.69

NOK:

100.29

PEG Ratio

ERIC:

0.00

NOK:

3.42

PS Ratio

ERIC:

0.18

NOK:

3.99

PB Ratio

ERIC:

0.41

NOK:

3.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

ERIC:

$229.49B

NOK:

$20.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ERIC:

$110.27B

NOK:

$8.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

ERIC:

$46.17B

NOK:

$2.24B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERIC vs. NOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERIC
ERIC Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ERIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERIC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ERIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERIC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

NOK
NOK Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOK Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOK Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERIC vs. NOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) and Nokia Corporation (NOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERICNOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.53

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

7.12

-3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

13.87

-5.30

ERIC vs. NOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the NOK Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERIC and NOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERICNOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

3.32

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.66

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.31

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.18

-0.07

Drawdowns

ERIC vs. NOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERIC drawdown since its inception was -98.59%, roughly equal to the maximum NOK drawdown of -95.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERIC and NOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERICNOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.59%

-95.99%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.79%

-24.59%

+8.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-29.74%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.96%

-50.56%

-13.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.59%

-62.56%

-4.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.12%

-51.51%

-30.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.77%

-64.87%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.14%

12.59%

-6.45%

Volatility

ERIC vs. NOK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (ERIC) is 13.21%, while Nokia Corporation (NOK) has a volatility of 28.40%. This indicates that ERIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERICNOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.21%

28.40%

-15.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.63%

40.37%

-16.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.47%

52.73%

-17.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.48%

36.92%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.20%

40.43%

-5.23%

Dividends

ERIC vs. NOK - Dividend Comparison

ERIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than NOK's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERIC
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
2.49%3.04%3.22%4.07%4.22%2.15%1.36%1.24%1.42%1.67%5.14%5.30%
NOK
Nokia Corporation
1.14%2.45%3.17%3.51%1.32%0.00%0.00%3.01%4.06%4.07%6.02%2.22%

Financials

ERIC vs. NOK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) and Nokia Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
51.13B
4.50B
(ERIC) Total Revenue
(NOK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ERIC vs. NOK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) and Nokia Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

38.0%40.0%42.0%44.0%46.0%48.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
48.1%
44.2%
Portfolio components
ERIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) reported a gross profit of 24.60B and revenue of 51.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.1%.

NOK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nokia Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 4.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

ERIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) reported an operating income of 5.48B and revenue of 51.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

NOK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nokia Corporation reported an operating income of 63.00M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.4%.

ERIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) reported a net income of 920.33M and revenue of 51.13B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.

NOK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nokia Corporation reported a net income of 86.00M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ERIC and NOK have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOK has higher volatility (28.40%) compared to ERIC (13.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERIC dropped -98.59% vs NOK's -95.99%.

NOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERIC and NOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer