IMOM vs. SGDJ
IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) and SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while SGDJ is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMOM returned 7.94%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for SGDJ. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMOM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDJ.
Performance
IMOM vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly higher than SGDJ's -5.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IMOM has underperformed SGDJ with an annualized return of 7.94%, while SGDJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.
IMOM
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 16.29%
- 6M
- 18.55%
- 1Y
- 39.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
SGDJ
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -11.96%
- YTD
- -5.68%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- 66.21%
- 3Y*
- 47.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
IMOM vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 16.29% | 47.20% | 5.22% | 9.15% | -21.92% | -0.75% | 28.39% | 18.26% | -23.07% | 34.83% |
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | -5.68% | 174.44% | 19.35% | 6.66% | -27.60% | -15.12% | 47.91% | 37.00% | -25.63% | 5.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMOM and SGDJ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, IMOM and SGDJ have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.
IMOM vs. SGDJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMOM
SGDJ
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Industrials
IMOM
SGDJ
-
Technology
IMOM
SGDJ
-
Basic Materials
IMOM
SGDJ
Utilities
IMOM
SGDJ
-
Energy
IMOM
SGDJ
-
Communication Services
IMOM
SGDJ
-
Financial Services
IMOM
SGDJ
-
Real Estate
IMOM
SGDJ
-
Healthcare
IMOM
SGDJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
IMOM
SGDJ
-
Consumer Defensive
IMOM
-
SGDJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMOM vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank
IMOM
SGDJ
IMOM vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMOM | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 1.86 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.23 | 5.04 | +5.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMOM vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, smaller than the maximum SGDJ drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and SGDJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMOM | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -59.27% | +13.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -36.84% | +21.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.51% | -36.84% | +19.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.27% | -52.66% | +13.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.74% | -59.27% | +13.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | -31.23% | +27.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.15% | -26.25% | +12.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 13.57% | -9.73% |
Volatility
IMOM vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) is 8.31%, while Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a volatility of 17.17%. This indicates that IMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMOM | SGDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 17.17% | -8.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.95% | 41.94% | -23.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 49.96% | -29.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 40.69% | -20.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 40.92% | -20.62% |
IMOM vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMOM vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison
IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than SGDJ's 8.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 2.17% | 2.53% | 4.52% | 2.95% | 6.06% | 1.27% | 0.59% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 8.88% | 8.37% | 6.55% | 4.55% | 2.46% | 2.20% | 1.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.77% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMOM and SGDJ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGDJ has higher volatility (17.17%) compared to IMOM (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs SGDJ's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, SGDJ leads with 10.80% vs 7.94% for IMOM. On fees, IMOM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IMOM has been the lower-risk option at 8.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 10.80% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMOM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDJ.
SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.88%, compared with 2.17% for IMOM.
IMOM is categorized as Momentum, while SGDJ is Gold. IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.50% for SGDJ.
IMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMOM and SGDJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer