IMOM vs. SCHD
IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMOM returned 7.94%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMOM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
IMOM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IMOM has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 7.94%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.
IMOM
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 16.29%
- 6M
- 18.55%
- 1Y
- 39.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
IMOM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 16.29% | 47.20% | 5.22% | 9.15% | -21.92% | -0.75% | 28.39% | 18.26% | -23.07% | 34.83% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMOM and SCHD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.47 |
The correlation between IMOM and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IMOM vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMOM
SCHD
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
IMOM
SCHD
Technology
IMOM
SCHD
Basic Materials
IMOM
SCHD
Utilities
IMOM
SCHD
Energy
IMOM
SCHD
Communication Services
IMOM
SCHD
Financial Services
IMOM
SCHD
Real Estate
IMOM
SCHD
-
Healthcare
IMOM
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
IMOM
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
IMOM
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMOM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
IMOM
SCHD
IMOM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMOM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 5.70 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.23 | 13.97 | -3.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMOM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMOM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -33.37% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -4.61% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.51% | -16.13% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.27% | -16.85% | -22.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.74% | -33.37% | -12.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | -0.03% | -3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.15% | -3.31% | -10.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 1.89% | +1.95% |
Volatility
IMOM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that IMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMOM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 3.05% | +5.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.95% | 7.53% | +10.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 10.93% | +9.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 14.38% | +5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 16.72% | +3.58% |
IMOM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMOM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 2.17% | 2.53% | 4.52% | 2.95% | 6.06% | 1.27% | 0.59% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMOM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMOM has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 7.94% for IMOM. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IMOM.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.17% for IMOM.
IMOM is categorized as Momentum, while SCHD is Dividend. IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMOM and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer