IMOM vs. MMTM
IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) and MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) are both Momentum funds - IMOM tracks the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR) while MMTM tracks the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMOM returned 7.38%/yr vs 14.83%/yr for MMTM. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMOM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for MMTM.
Performance
IMOM vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 5.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IMOM has underperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 7.38%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.83% annualized return.
IMOM
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 36.25%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.38%
MMTM
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- 5.27%
- 6M
- 3.94%
- 1Y
- 18.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
IMOM vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 13.79% | 47.20% | 5.22% | 9.15% | -21.92% | -0.75% | 28.39% | 18.26% | -23.07% | 34.83% |
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 5.27% | 13.26% | 29.94% | 22.49% | -16.12% | 26.33% | 19.27% | 29.98% | -4.62% | 24.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMOM and MMTM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.61 |
The correlation between IMOM and MMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMOM vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMOM
MMTM
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
IMOM
MMTM
Technology
IMOM
MMTM
Basic Materials
IMOM
MMTM
Utilities
IMOM
MMTM
Energy
IMOM
MMTM
Communication Services
IMOM
MMTM
Financial Services
IMOM
MMTM
Real Estate
IMOM
MMTM
Healthcare
IMOM
MMTM
Consumer Cyclical
IMOM
MMTM
Consumer Defensive
IMOM
-
MMTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMOM vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank
IMOM
MMTM
IMOM vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMOM | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.93 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 8.42 | +0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMOM vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and MMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMOM | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -33.85% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -9.89% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.51% | -22.08% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.27% | -23.72% | -15.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.74% | -33.85% | -11.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -4.99% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.13% | -4.19% | -9.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 2.26% | +1.64% |
Volatility
IMOM vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 4.15%. This indicates that IMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMOM | MMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.35% | 4.15% | +4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 10.97% | +7.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 14.57% | +6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 18.26% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 18.66% | +1.62% |
IMOM vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMOM vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison
IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than MMTM's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 2.22% | 2.53% | 4.52% | 2.95% | 6.06% | 1.27% | 0.59% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 0.88% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMOM and MMTM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMOM has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to MMTM (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs MMTM's -33.85%.
On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 14.83% vs 7.38% for IMOM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IMOM.
IMOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.88% for MMTM.
IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.12% for MMTM.
IMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMOM and MMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer