IMOM vs. MEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX).
IMOM and MEMX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMOM is a passively managed fund by EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC that tracks the performance of the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). It was launched on Dec 23, 2015. MEMX is an actively managed fund by Matthews. It was launched on Jan 10, 2023.
Performance
IMOM vs. MEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMOM vs. MEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 4.48% | 47.20% | 5.22% | 8.05% |
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF | 6.51% | 35.88% | 5.50% | 10.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than MEMX's 6.51% return.
IMOM
- 1D
- 4.18%
- 1M
- -11.99%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 44.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
MEMX
- 1D
- 4.04%
- 1M
- -11.05%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 49.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMOM vs. MEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMOM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MEMX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMOM vs. MEMX — Risk / Return Rank
IMOM
MEMX
IMOM vs. MEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMOM | MEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.01 | 2.46 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 3.12 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 3.37 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.73 | 14.15 | -2.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMOM | MEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 2.46 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.11 | -0.77 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMOM and MEMX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IMOM vs. MEMX - Dividend Comparison
IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than MEMX's 4.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 2.42% | 2.53% | 4.52% | 2.95% | 6.06% | 1.27% | 0.59% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
MEMX Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF | 4.58% | 4.88% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IMOM vs. MEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, which is greater than MEMX's maximum drawdown of -19.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and MEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMOM | MEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -19.27% | -26.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -14.70% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.08% | -11.25% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.37% | -3.53% | -10.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 3.50% | +0.11% |
Volatility
IMOM vs. MEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) is 10.61%, while Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF (MEMX) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that IMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMOM | MEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.61% | 11.60% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.14% | 16.22% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.43% | 20.39% | +2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 16.07% | +3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 16.07% | +4.02% |