PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMOM vs. DIVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMOM vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly higher than DIVI's 11.97% return. Over the past 10 years, IMOM has underperformed DIVI with an annualized return of 7.94%, while DIVI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.


IMOM

1D
1.30%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
16.29%
6M
18.55%
1Y
39.37%
3Y*
23.40%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
7.94%

DIVI

1D
0.58%
1M
3.26%
YTD
11.97%
6M
13.43%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMOM vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
16.29%47.20%5.22%9.15%-21.92%-0.75%28.39%18.26%-23.07%34.83%
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
11.97%34.86%1.77%18.97%-1.21%16.95%1.29%22.98%-6.73%13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IMOM and DIVI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

0.69

The correlation between IMOM and DIVI shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IMOM vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMOM
DIVI

Industrials

31.2%
16.6%

Technology

18.7%
12.1%

Basic Materials

14.5%
5.8%

Utilities

10.7%
4.4%

Energy

10.3%
4.3%

Communication Services

6.3%
4.6%

Financial Services

4.2%
26.8%

Real Estate

4.2%
2.1%

Healthcare

3.3%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.8%

Industrials

IMOM
31.2%
DIVI
16.6%

Technology

IMOM
18.7%
DIVI
12.1%

Basic Materials

IMOM
14.5%
DIVI
5.8%

Utilities

IMOM
10.7%
DIVI
4.4%

Energy

IMOM
10.3%
DIVI
4.3%

Communication Services

IMOM
6.3%
DIVI
4.6%

Financial Services

IMOM
4.2%
DIVI
26.8%

Real Estate

IMOM
4.2%
DIVI
2.1%

Healthcare

IMOM
3.3%
DIVI
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IMOM
1.7%
DIVI
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

IMOM

-

DIVI
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMOM vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMOM
IMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVI
DIVI Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DIVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVI Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMOM vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMOMDIVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.44

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

9.36

+0.88

IMOM vs. DIVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the DIVI Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMOM and DIVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMOM vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, which is greater than DIVI's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and DIVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMOMDIVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.74%

-27.76%

-17.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.61%

-10.54%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.51%

-14.58%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.27%

-18.53%

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.74%

-27.76%

-17.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.90%

-0.05%

-3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.15%

-3.62%

-10.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

2.75%

+1.09%

Volatility

IMOM vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) at 5.63%. This indicates that IMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMOMDIVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

5.63%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.95%

12.85%

+5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.49%

15.39%

+5.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.04%

15.40%

+4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

16.49%

+3.81%

IMOM vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVI's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMOM vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison

IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than DIVI's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
3.50%3.76%4.39%3.17%6.03%2.77%8.04%1.61%5.67%5.22%11.56%
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
2.17%2.53%4.52%2.95%6.06%1.27%0.59%1.17%0.78%1.11%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMOM and DIVI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMOM has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to DIVI (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs DIVI's -27.76%.

On 10-year performance, DIVI leads with 11.78% vs 7.94% for IMOM. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IMOM.

DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 2.17% for IMOM.

IMOM is categorized as Momentum, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while DIVI tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.09% for DIVI.

IMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMOM and DIVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer