IMIDX vs. MACGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX).
IMIDX is managed by Congress. It was launched on Oct 31, 2012. MACGX is managed by Morgan Stanley. It was launched on Mar 30, 1990.
Performance
IMIDX vs. MACGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMIDX vs. MACGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund | 1.31% | -4.88% | 18.11% | 16.29% | -26.94% | 29.42% | 30.57% | 42.36% | -4.98% | 15.91% |
MACGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A | -11.39% | 13.71% | 42.06% | 46.30% | -63.51% | -12.84% | 142.01% | 39.41% | 11.85% | 38.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMIDX achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly higher than MACGX's -11.39% return. Over the past 10 years, IMIDX has underperformed MACGX with an annualized return of 10.76%, while MACGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.
IMIDX
- 1D
- 4.25%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- -5.75%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
MACGX
- 1D
- 4.70%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- -11.39%
- 6M
- -20.28%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.48%
- 5Y*
- -7.74%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMIDX vs. MACGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMIDX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MACGX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMIDX vs. MACGX — Risk / Return Rank
IMIDX
MACGX
IMIDX vs. MACGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMIDX | MACGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.36 | 0.27 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.68 | 0.62 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.08 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 0.29 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | 0.73 | +0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMIDX | MACGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 0.27 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | -0.16 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.33 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.31 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMIDX and MACGX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IMIDX vs. MACGX - Dividend Comparison
IMIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.10%, while MACGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund | 13.10% | 13.27% | 27.75% | 6.27% | 5.80% | 12.29% | 2.06% | 10.80% | 2.99% | 0.04% | 1.11% | 0.80% |
MACGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 52.53% | 9.95% | 15.34% | 29.46% | 48.48% | 75.72% | 14.05% |
Drawdowns
IMIDX vs. MACGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMIDX drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, smaller than the maximum MACGX drawdown of -77.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMIDX and MACGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMIDX | MACGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.15% | -77.61% | +42.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.10% | -27.55% | +15.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.88% | -77.61% | +42.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.15% | -77.61% | +42.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.61% | -50.74% | +41.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -25.53% | +18.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 10.93% | -6.26% |
Volatility
IMIDX vs. MACGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) is 8.22%, while Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX) has a volatility of 9.52%. This indicates that IMIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MACGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMIDX | MACGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 9.52% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 22.32% | -8.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.85% | 32.22% | -11.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 48.42% | -27.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 39.21% | -18.23% |