PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMIDX vs. MACGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMIDX vs. MACGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMIDX achieves a 15.44% return, which is significantly higher than MACGX's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, IMIDX has underperformed MACGX with an annualized return of 11.93%, while MACGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.70% annualized return.


IMIDX

1D
0.82%
1M
1.15%
YTD
15.44%
6M
13.45%
1Y
14.96%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
11.93%

MACGX

1D
-1.67%
1M
5.93%
YTD
6.63%
6M
3.09%
1Y
5.74%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
-3.23%
10Y*
14.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMIDX vs. MACGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMIDX
Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund
15.44%-4.88%18.11%16.29%-26.94%29.42%30.57%42.36%-4.98%15.91%
MACGX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A
6.63%13.71%42.06%46.30%-63.51%-12.84%142.01%39.41%11.85%38.99%

Correlation

The correlation between IMIDX and MACGX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2012

0.74

The correlation between IMIDX and MACGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMIDX vs. MACGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMIDX
IMIDX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IMIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IMIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MACGX
MACGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MACGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MACGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMIDX vs. MACGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMIDXMACGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.06

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

0.26

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.34

0.55

+2.79

IMIDX vs. MACGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMIDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the MACGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMIDX and MACGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMIDXMACGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.25

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

-0.07

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.37

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.33

+0.33

Drawdowns

IMIDX vs. MACGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMIDX drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, smaller than the maximum MACGX drawdown of -77.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMIDX and MACGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMIDXMACGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.15%

-77.61%

+42.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.10%

-27.55%

+15.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

-28.55%

+5.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.88%

-77.61%

+42.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.15%

-77.61%

+42.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-40.72%

+38.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-25.65%

+18.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

12.75%

-8.20%

Volatility

IMIDX vs. MACGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) is 6.02%, while Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A (MACGX) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that IMIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MACGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMIDXMACGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

8.96%

-2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.95%

21.23%

-6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

27.81%

-9.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

48.30%

-26.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.12%

39.37%

-18.25%

IMIDX vs. MACGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMIDX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MACGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMIDX vs. MACGX - Dividend Comparison

IMIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.50%, while MACGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMIDX
Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund
11.50%13.27%27.75%6.27%5.80%12.29%2.06%10.80%2.99%0.04%1.11%0.80%
MACGX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%52.53%9.95%15.34%29.46%48.48%75.72%14.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMIDX and MACGX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MACGX has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to IMIDX (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMIDX dropped -35.15% vs MACGX's -77.61%.

IMIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMIDX and MACGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer