IMFL vs. AGG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG).
IMFL and AGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2021. AGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2003. Both IMFL and AGG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IMFL vs. AGG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMFL vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 7.24% | 30.89% | -3.57% | 25.51% | -17.32% | 6.94% |
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.02% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | 0.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMFL achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.02% return.
IMFL
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 16.45%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- —
AGG
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMFL vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMFL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMFL vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank
IMFL
AGG
IMFL vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMFL | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 1.00 | +1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.61 | 1.42 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.18 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 1.81 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.54 | 5.07 | +5.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMFL | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.00 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.04 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.59 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMFL and AGG is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IMFL vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison
IMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than AGG's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 3.15% | 2.88% | 3.56% | 3.85% | 3.35% | 3.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.93% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Drawdowns
IMFL vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMFL and AGG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMFL | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.26% | -18.43% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -2.52% | -9.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.26% | -17.82% | -15.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.70% | -2.36% | -6.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -2.71% | -4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 0.90% | +2.10% |
Volatility
IMFL vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.66%. This indicates that IMFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMFL | AGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.94% | 1.66% | +6.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 2.55% | +9.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 4.37% | +12.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 6.07% | +9.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 5.39% | +10.47% |