IMFL vs. ICOW
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW).
IMFL and ICOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2021. ICOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2017. Both IMFL and ICOW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMFL or ICOW.
Correlation
The correlation between IMFL and ICOW is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IMFL vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IMFL:
-0.21
ICOW:
-0.14
IMFL:
-0.20
ICOW:
-0.10
IMFL:
0.98
ICOW:
0.99
IMFL:
-0.28
ICOW:
-0.19
IMFL:
-0.68
ICOW:
-0.45
IMFL:
4.39%
ICOW:
3.95%
IMFL:
14.07%
ICOW:
12.89%
IMFL:
-33.25%
ICOW:
-43.49%
IMFL:
-10.57%
ICOW:
-7.91%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMFL achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 0.17% return.
IMFL
-0.60%
-4.36%
-7.94%
-3.12%
N/A
N/A
ICOW
0.17%
-2.66%
-5.86%
-1.99%
4.86%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMFL vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMFL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMFL vs. ICOW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IMFL
ICOW
IMFL vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMFL vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
IMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than ICOW's 4.38% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 3.58% | 3.56% | 3.85% | 3.36% | 3.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.38% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.62% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
IMFL vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMFL and ICOW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMFL vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.