IMF vs. JPFP
IMF (Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and JPFP (JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JPFP.
Performance
IMF vs. JPFP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IMF
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- 11.36%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPFP
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMF vs. JPFP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -1.59% |
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | -2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMF and JPFP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMF vs. JPFP — Risk / Return Rank
IMF
JPFP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IMF vs. JPFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) and JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMF | JPFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.14 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMF vs. JPFP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMF drawdown since its inception was -15.29%, which is greater than JPFP's maximum drawdown of -5.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMF and JPFP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMF | JPFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.29% | -5.82% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -4.53% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -2.33% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | — | — |
Volatility
IMF vs. JPFP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMF | JPFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 22.47% | -12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 22.47% | -10.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 22.47% | -10.08% |
IMF vs. JPFP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JPFP's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMF vs. JPFP - Dividend Comparison
IMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while JPFP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 0.91% | 1.01% |
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMF and JPFP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPFP is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPFP is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IMF.
IMF has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for JPFP.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IMF and 0.59% for JPFP.
Find the right allocation for IMF and JPFP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer