IMCG vs. SMMD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD).

IMCG and SMMD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. SMMD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2500 Index. It was launched on Jul 6, 2017. Both IMCG and SMMD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IMCG vs. SMMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IMCG vs. SMMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	-1.19%	6.55%	18.14%	20.73%	-25.79%	15.39%	45.64%	35.70%	-3.68%	11.10%
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF	2.10%	11.72%	11.87%	17.71%	-18.53%	18.30%	19.98%	28.01%	-10.58%	10.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than SMMD's 2.10% return.

IMCG

• 1D: 3.63%
• 1M: -6.39%
• YTD: -1.19%
• 6M: -4.39%
• 1Y: 11.14%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: 5.08%
• 10Y*: 12.58%

SMMD

• 1D: 3.53%
• 1M: -5.15%
• YTD: 2.10%
• 6M: 4.19%
• 1Y: 23.65%
• 3Y*: 13.21%
• 5Y*: 5.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCG vs. SMMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

SMMD

iShares Russell 2500 ETF

IMCG

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

Return for Risk

IMCG vs. SMMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCG

IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 35
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

SMMD

SMMD Risk / Return Rank: 65
SMMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SMMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SMMD Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SMMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SMMD Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCG vs. SMMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IMCG	SMMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	1.08	-0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	1.62	-0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.22	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	1.67	-0.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	7.05	-3.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IMCG vs. SMMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the SMMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCG and SMMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IMCG	SMMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55	1.08	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.25	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.42	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between IMCG and SMMD is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IMCG vs. SMMD - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than SMMD's 1.22% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.80%	0.78%	0.78%	0.85%	0.91%	0.41%	0.09%	0.30%	0.35%	0.45%	0.52%	0.38%
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF	1.22%	1.28%	1.27%	1.44%	1.79%	1.12%	1.31%	1.50%	2.45%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. SMMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than SMMD's maximum drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and SMMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMCG	SMMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.96%	-41.06%	-17.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.99%	-14.02%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.08%	-28.26%	-6.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.90%	-6.47%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.29%	-8.52%	-0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	3.32%	-0.18%

Volatility

IMCG vs. SMMD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) have volatilities of 7.19% and 7.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMCG	SMMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.19%	7.30%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.08%	13.19%	-1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.27%	22.05%	-1.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.09%	20.80%	-0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.44%	22.46%	-2.02%