IMCG vs. PRDMX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth Fund (PRDMX).
IMCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. PRDMX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 31, 2003.
Performance
IMCG vs. PRDMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMCG vs. PRDMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.05% | 6.55% | 18.14% | 20.73% | -25.79% | 15.39% | 45.64% | 35.70% | -3.68% | 25.57% |
PRDMX T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth Fund | -6.03% | 19.47% | 23.77% | 20.75% | -24.65% | 13.56% | 31.82% | 37.91% | -3.15% | 24.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than PRDMX's -6.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMCG having a 12.72% annualized return and PRDMX not far ahead at 12.93%.
IMCG
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- -2.78%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
PRDMX
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- -6.03%
- 6M
- -1.10%
- 1Y
- 19.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMCG vs. PRDMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PRDMX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMCG vs. PRDMX — Risk / Return Rank
IMCG
PRDMX
IMCG vs. PRDMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth Fund (PRDMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMCG | PRDMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | 0.86 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 1.43 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.19 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 1.55 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 5.52 | -1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMCG | PRDMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 0.86 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.33 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.60 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.49 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCG and PRDMX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IMCG vs. PRDMX - Dividend Comparison
IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than PRDMX's 16.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.79% | 0.78% | 0.78% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% |
PRDMX T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth Fund | 16.49% | 15.49% | 8.59% | 6.83% | 1.22% | 10.13% | 4.80% | 2.02% | 5.23% | 3.71% | 1.23% | 3.78% |
Drawdowns
IMCG vs. PRDMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, roughly equal to the maximum PRDMX drawdown of -57.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and PRDMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMCG | PRDMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.96% | -57.57% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -13.31% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.08% | -35.69% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.08% | -35.91% | +0.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -9.52% | +3.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -8.44% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 3.75% | -0.59% |
Volatility
IMCG vs. PRDMX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth Fund (PRDMX) have volatilities of 7.19% and 7.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMCG | PRDMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 7.23% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 15.49% | -3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 24.29% | -3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 22.14% | -2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 21.46% | -1.02% |