PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCG vs. FEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCG vs. FEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IMCG

1D
1.73%
1M
8.63%
YTD
20.36%
6M
19.45%
1Y
25.02%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
14.49%

FEMG

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.84%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCG vs. FEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IMCG and FEMG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026

0.72

IMCG vs. FEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCG
FEMG

Technology

30.4%
24.0%

Industrials

26.6%
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
17.4%

Financial Services

9.1%
6.0%

Healthcare

7.4%
12.6%

Basic Materials

4.5%
0.7%

Real Estate

3.4%
1.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.7%

Energy

2.1%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
1.4%

Technology

IMCG
30.4%
FEMG
24.0%

Industrials

IMCG
26.6%
FEMG
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IMCG
10.0%
FEMG
17.4%

Financial Services

IMCG
9.1%
FEMG
6.0%

Healthcare

IMCG
7.4%
FEMG
12.6%

Basic Materials

IMCG
4.5%
FEMG
0.7%

Real Estate

IMCG
3.4%
FEMG
1.8%

Utilities

IMCG
2.7%
FEMG
2.9%

Communication Services

IMCG
2.6%
FEMG
2.7%

Energy

IMCG
2.1%
FEMG
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

IMCG
1.2%
FEMG
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCG vs. FEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCG
IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCG vs. FEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMCGFEMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.66

IMCG vs. FEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMCGFEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

6.56

-6.02

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. FEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than FEMG's maximum drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and FEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCGFEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.96%

-3.29%

-55.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.34%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-0.95%

-8.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

Volatility

IMCG vs. FEMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCGFEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

12.04%

+3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

12.04%

+8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

12.04%

+8.48%

IMCG vs. FEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMG's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCG vs. FEMG - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMG
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.65%0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCG and FEMG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IMCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FEMG.

IMCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCG and 0.23% for FEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCG and FEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer