IMCB vs. OPTZ
IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) and OPTZ (Optimize Strategy Index ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - IMCB tracks the IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index while OPTZ tracks the Optimize Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IMCB returned 24.63% vs 63.04% for OPTZ. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMCB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OPTZ.
Performance
IMCB vs. OPTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCB achieves a 15.00% return, which is significantly lower than OPTZ's 31.03% return.
IMCB
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 6M
- 15.90%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
OPTZ
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 11.82%
- YTD
- 31.03%
- 6M
- 32.85%
- 1Y
- 63.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMCB vs. OPTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 15.00% | 10.25% | 10.71% |
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF | 31.03% | 22.83% | 16.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCB and OPTZ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2024 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IMCB and OPTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMCB vs. OPTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMCB
OPTZ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
IMCB
OPTZ
Industrials
IMCB
OPTZ
Financial Services
IMCB
OPTZ
Consumer Cyclical
IMCB
OPTZ
Healthcare
IMCB
OPTZ
Energy
IMCB
OPTZ
Utilities
IMCB
OPTZ
Basic Materials
IMCB
OPTZ
Consumer Defensive
IMCB
OPTZ
Real Estate
IMCB
OPTZ
Communication Services
IMCB
OPTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMCB vs. OPTZ — Risk / Return Rank
IMCB
OPTZ
IMCB vs. OPTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMCB | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 3.50 | -1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 4.59 | -1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.58 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 5.97 | -2.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 27.20 | -14.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMCB | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 3.50 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 1.70 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
IMCB vs. OPTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCB drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, which is greater than OPTZ's maximum drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCB and OPTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMCB | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.80% | -25.75% | -33.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.05% | -10.63% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.73% | -3.40% | -4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.33% | -0.30% |
Volatility
IMCB vs. OPTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) is 3.37%, while Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a volatility of 6.12%. This indicates that IMCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMCB | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 6.12% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 13.54% | -3.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 18.09% | -5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 20.68% | -3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 20.68% | -1.03% |
IMCB vs. OPTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than OPTZ's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMCB vs. OPTZ - Dividend Comparison
IMCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than OPTZ's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.47% |
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF | 0.45% | 0.58% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMCB and OPTZ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OPTZ has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to IMCB (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCB dropped -58.80% vs OPTZ's -25.75%.
On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 63.04% vs 24.63% for IMCB. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IMCB has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 63.04% return vs 24.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for OPTZ.
IMCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.45% for OPTZ.
IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index, while OPTZ tracks Optimize Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Optimize. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IMCB and 0.25% for OPTZ.
OPTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMCB and OPTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer