PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCB vs. IGSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCB vs. IGSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCB achieves a 16.61% return, which is significantly higher than IGSB's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCB has outperformed IGSB with an annualized return of 11.06%, while IGSB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.72% annualized return.


IMCB

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.79%
6M
12.05%
YTD
16.61%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
11.06%
ALL TIME*
10.35%

IGSB

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.14%
6M
0.85%
YTD
0.93%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*
2.72%
ALL TIME*
2.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCB vs. IGSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
16.61%10.25%15.10%16.37%-16.09%22.81%13.35%31.49%-11.53%19.70%
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.93%6.96%4.97%6.40%-5.63%-0.56%5.37%7.11%1.25%1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCB and IGSB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2007

0.07

Over the past year, IMCB and IGSB have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCB vs. IGSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCB
IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IGSB
IGSB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IGSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGSB Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IGSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCB vs. IGSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCBIGSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.38

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.66

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.82

10.60

-0.78

IMCB vs. IGSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the IGSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCB and IGSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCB vs. IGSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCB drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, which is greater than IGSB's maximum drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCB and IGSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCBIGSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.80%

-13.38%

-45.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.05%

-1.46%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

-1.46%

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

-9.46%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.99%

-13.38%

-27.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.21%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-0.85%

-6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

0.36%

+1.69%

Volatility

IMCB vs. IGSB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) has a higher volatility of 2.17% compared to iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) at 0.57%. This indicates that IMCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCBIGSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

0.57%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

1.56%

+8.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

1.96%

+11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

2.95%

+14.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

3.47%

+16.14%

IMCB vs. IGSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IMCB and IGSB have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCB vs. IGSB - Dividend Comparison

IMCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than IGSB's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.60%4.44%4.02%3.26%2.07%1.82%2.36%3.06%2.46%1.65%1.45%1.18%
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.42%1.43%1.55%1.70%1.08%1.12%1.32%1.80%1.31%1.79%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCB and IGSB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMCB has higher volatility (2.17%) compared to IGSB (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCB dropped -58.80% vs IGSB's -13.38%.

On 10-year performance, IMCB leads with 11.06% vs 2.72% for IGSB. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, IGSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 2.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCB and IGSB have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

IGSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 1.22% for IMCB.

IMCB is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IGSB is Corporate Bonds. IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index, while IGSB tracks ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Corporate Index.

IGSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCB and IGSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer